Newsflash: German court rules circumcision is ‘bodily harm’ and(!) contravenes the interest of the decide later in life on his religious beliefs

A Court (Landgericht Köln/Cologne) rules that circumcision contravenes “interests of the child to decide later in life on his religious beliefs”. An argument which can be used to outlaw anything parents do and decide for their infants. Vegetarianism, for example, can be also viewed as a religious practice. So, are the parents allowed to decide what their children should eat? Will Muslim parents be forced to give their children pork, because they are infringing the rights of the children to decide for themselves? What will be outlawed next? The Baptism?

Update: The Central Committee of Muslims in Germany (ZMD), the Turkish Community in Germany (TGD) and The Central Committee of Jews in Germany (ZKJ) as well as the German Bishops’ Conference criticise unanimously this decision as an infringement of the religious freedom.

From BBC News

A court in Germany has ruled that circumcising young boys for religious reasons amounts to bodily harm.

In a decision that has caused outrage among Jewish and Muslim groups, the court said that a child’s right to physical integrity trumps religious and parental rights.

The case involved a doctor who carried out a circumcision on a four year-old that led to medical complications.

Thousands of Muslim and Jewish boys are circumcised in Germany every year.

Although male circumcision – unlike female circumcision – is not illegal in Germany, the court’s judgement said the “fundamental right of the child to bodily integrity outweighed the fundamental rights of the parents”.

Circumcision, it decided, contravenes “interests of the child to decide later in life on his religious beliefs”.

‘Protect religious freedom’

The doctor involved in the case was acquitted and the ruling is not binding, but correspondents say it sets a precedent that would be taken into account by other German courts.

The president of Germany’s Central Council of Jews, Dieter Graumann, called it “an unprecedented and dramatic intervention in the right of religious communities to self-determination”.

He urged the country’s parliament to clarify the legal situation “to protect religious freedom against attacks”.

Male circumcision is part of the ancient religious rituals of both the Jewish and Muslim faiths, as well as the traditions of some tribal groups.

In some countries, such as the United States, it is also not uncommon for parents to request that young boys are circumcised for health reasons.

The BBC’s Stephen Evans in Germany says it is unclear what the next legal step will be, but this issue is a moral and political minefield.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Newsflash: German court rules circumcision is ‘bodily harm’ and(!) contravenes the interest of the decide later in life on his religious beliefs

  1. Toadspittle says:

    .

    They’ll be denying a child’s right to be stolen at birth by leprechauns next.

  2. Toadspittle says:

    .
    Excellent point comparing circumcision to vegetarianism.

    Parents have every right to cut whatever bits off their children that they think fit!
    Yes, and then eat them afterwards.

    Swift would have heartily approved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s