
By Cardinal Timothy Dolan
From Catholic New York
Do you agree that we get way too many statistics? Seems as if every time I turn around, I’m looking at “the results of a new survey.” What’s worse, the findings often seem to contradict themselves!
One of these statistics does haunt me, though: recently scholarly research shows that, over the last decade or so, about 10 percent of our Catholic people have left the Church.
I don’t mean they have just drifted from the practice of the faith, or consider themselves “lapsed Catholics.” That’s worrisome enough, and there’s, sadly, a lot of them, too. But, at least these still consider themselves “part of the family.” I’m more bothered by those who have left and don’t have plans to return home.
To invite them back is a high priority of what we call the new evangelization, which both Blessed John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI have signaled as the pastoral challenge of our day.
A good place to start, I guess, is to ask why the folks leave.
Good news: some research has offered a few reasons.
Bad news: the answers are not conclusive.
When people read these studies those who might identify themselves as “liberal” chuckle and say, “See, I told you so!” when they see the following as reasons given for leaving the Church: “outdated” sexual morality, too “authoritarian and rigid,” oppressive of women, “backpedaling” on the reforms of the Second Vatican Council.
Wait, though, because those who claim to be “conservative” chime in, “Hold on!” as they point to an equal number who claim they left because the Church had gone “too soft,” “too wrapped up in peace and justice stuff,” “too flippant and folksy at the liturgy,” “too permissive on dissent.”
Then there are those who tell us they left the Church because they found another congregation far more appealing: better preaching, excellent music, a warm sense of welcome, a community atmosphere where “my needs were met.” Lord knows all that is worth listening to and learning from!
But I wonder if another group is most somber of all: this is the big percent that tell us they left the Church not so much because of any particular beef with Catholicism, or because they found another congregation more tantalizing, but because they do not see the need for any religion at all!
These are the ones who claim that they believe but could care less about belonging. They’re “spiritual” but not religious, they tell us.
Some of them detest “organized religion.” Others tolerate it, as long as it makes no mark on public life. Then another group shrugs and could care less.
Scholars a lot smarter than I will ever be are asking if this is perilous—obviously for the Church—but also for America.
Because at the heart of the noble American project is a recognition that religion is essential for a virtuous democracy and the promotion of the common good.
At our meeting in Atlanta last month, we bishops spent a lot of time on religious freedom, here at home and internationally.
The President of the Catholic University of America, himself a constitutional lawyer and former dean of the law school at Boston College, Mr. John Garvey, got us thinking when he observed that the real threat to religious liberty in America was not so much from Republicans or Democrats, as much as from a developing sentiment in American life that religion itself is silly, unnecessary, superstitious, a waste of time, boring. If one could care less about religion, Mr. Garvey concluded, well, one can hardly be expected to defend the freedom to exercise it.
And, if that’s the case, look out: Because, not only will the Church be hurt, but so will our country. He has obviously been reading the same statistics I have!
Worth thinking about this week after the Fourth of July, and our Fortnight for Freedom.
Worth thinking about, as we look for pastorally creative ways to get those who have left “back with the family.”
Worth thinking about, as we meet the challenge of new evangelization.






A challenging piece. How far are we dealing with recycling, so to say? That is Anglican like me feeling they’ve been left and being kindly (or not) received elsewhere? Are we bringing fresh souls to Christ in the West?
I would agree with the first assessment if this was an isolated study. Lets be hones those that claim that they do not see the need for organized religion are saying that due to poor formation or rather bad catechizes. Yet another product of what has now become “the council.”
Look I see what you are trying to do with blaming both sides by simply splitting the baby in two and saying we are all to blame. The fact is the trend starts somewhere and it starts with “the council” it continues with the implementation and it ends oddly enough with the return to tradition.
Let us look at those communities that are growing and I mean growing without defect in other words not just simply growing in numbers, because such a boast could easily be made by such pseudo heretics “the way” but rather are growing thriving and are given great return to the Church in both clergy and well formed brave laity of which it has been consistently the traditional orders that continue to do this despite every effort to thwart them. How is it that only 5% of the laity that are consider traditional give to the church 15% of its world wide seminarians?
Again the fever of “the council” must break and though I am confident that the time is near when this will happen it is obvious that enough of that wicked generation have not gone to their reward yet for that happen.
.
Another very good and thought-provoking offering from CP&S.
“Again the fever of “the council” must break and though I am confident that the time is near when this will happen it is obvious that enough of that wicked generation have not gone to their reward yet for that happen.”
Perhaps another reason people are skeptical of the Catholic Church is the way words like “wicked” and “hate” are flung about so casually, Giovanni. About one another in many cases. What would Christ say?
Toad is one of those who believe the Church has become bloated, materialistic, and distorted over the centuries from its original message of simple love, non-violence and passivity in the face of agression, and evolved into a vast ruthless, secretive and cynical organisation, mired in corruption and very similar to today’s oil companies, banks and many media outlets.
Oh, and let’s not forget politics in this comparison. Plenty of obscure eccsiastical politics, obfuscation, cover-ups, and jobs for the boys (not the girls, of course.)
No, those are not sufficient reasons for totally rejecting the Church. But they don’t enhance its case very much, I belive.
(What a lot of tripe for so early on a Sunday, Toad.)
These days, there seem to be people who believe that the world is headed for a period of problems and difficulties that will be so complex and overwhelming that we cannot even begin to imagine what it will be like.
If those people are right, then the new evangelization may pretty much take care of itself.
I don’t know if there’s any relevance, but this morning (Sunday) I went as usual to a church here in the Archdiocese of Cologne, Germany, where Mass in the extraordinary form is celebrated.
There were people of all ages there, from children to seniors.
The church was packed.
Christ never promised us that life would be a bowl of cherries: Indeed, even in His own time some of His followers couldn’t stomach His teachings on the Eucharist. They left – He didn’t run after them to try and get them to reconsider; He even asked the Apostles if they were going to leave too.
Our Church has always attempted to guide us: Will we now bow our heads in obedience? Or will we try going it on our own?
Go to Confession, partake in the Eucharist and pray to Our Lord for His mercy and His help.
.
“These days, there seem to be people who believe that the world is headed for a period of problems and difficulties that will be so complex and overwhelming that we cannot even begin to imagine what it will be like.”
Robert John is correct in saying that, I think, because I am one of those people.
Who isn’t?
In fact he world has has been like that for practically a hundred years, since the beginning of the first World War.
Sometimes the upheavals are “good” for religion, sometimes not. But surely it is clear that those folk who, throughout that period, confidently thought religion would shrivel up and vanish – were wrong.
How about doing what was spoken in today’s Sunday Gospel, people who have a living faith in the Lord Jesus witness with their words, but also by their lives.
.
How about that, indeed, Annemo.
Possibly because obscure and arcane arguments about the role of 8th century women deacons, or the correct length of an 16th century chasuble are more fun?
When the mass was watered down, so was the faith. Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi.
I was just talking to someone yesterday and saying how the Novus Ordo mass is “all things ordinary”. The language, the musical styles, the “common area” feel of the SANCTUARY (social gathering hall is more like it). Everything about it is so ordinary that even the people come dressed for a picnic. I think it’s normal and natural to “dress for the occassion” and it’s pretty clear what is in people’s hearts when they come to mass in their shorts, tanks and flip-flops. They can’t really believe they are approaching the King of Kings if that is how they prepare themselves. Actions speak louder than words. (And that includes handling Jesus in the Eucharist the same as we do a potato chip — hand to mouth.)
We must really and truly give our very best to God and that includes the most perfect and beautiful form of worship. When we really know that something different is happening here, we are changed from within and it will produce great fruits in how we live our lives. We will be evangelizing by how we live. Lex Orandi, Lex Credendi, LEX VIVENDI (how we live). Otherwise, it’s nothing more than “organized religion”.