You Killed the Author of Life!” and other unsual sermon content. A reflection on the striking and bold content of the early Kerygma


The scene is Pentecost Sunday and Simon Peter has just received the Holy Spirit along with 120 others. A crowd has gathered, intrigued by the manifestation of the Spirit in the upper room. The door opens and out steps Simon Peter. and he begins to boldly proclaim Christ. After an initial summary of Jesus’ life and actions, and a doxology, Peter strikes home and says to those gathered:

Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Messiah. (Acts 2:36)

A few days later Peter preached even more acutely:

You handed Jesus over to be killed, and you disowned him before Pilate, though he had decided to let him go. You disowned the Holy and Righteous One and asked that a murderer be released to you. You killed the author of life, but God raised him from the dead. We are witnesses of this….“Now, fellow Israelites, I know that you acted in ignorance, as did your leaders.Repent, then, and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out... (Acts 3:14-20)

Apparently Peter never got the memo that we preachers are not supposed to mention unpleasant things like sin and certainly not accuse our listeners of having sinned. He apparently didn’t understand that we who preach are supposed to issue the usual bromides of affirmation and speak only in abstractions and generalities. Imagine, he calls them killers, co-conspirators in handing over God to be crucified. Yes, he does: You killed the author of life!

Of course in referring to “the memo,” I speak of the unwritten rule among many priests and deacons today, especially of of the older generation 55 and up, which said, in effect: never offend anyone, ever, under any circumstances. Say nothing of controversy, or anything that might upset anyone, ever. And by all means do not mention, sin, hell, judgment or purgatory. Don’t mention specific moral topics either like abortion, fornication, contraception, divorce, gay anything, and don’t you dare mention that missing Mass is a mortal sin, or even let the phrase “mortal sin” escape your lips.

Well you get the point. And yet here is Peter saying, “You killed the author of life!” And he’s not talking to the person next to you, dear reader, he’s talking to you. That’s right you did that. And so did I. Yes we are sinners. And if we don’t repent and receive his mercy were going to be lost, we’re going to go to Hell. (Oops, did I say “Hell?”)

Now of course the usual logic is that if we talk plainly like this we’ll offend people and that they’ll stop coming. Now, never mind that our churches have largely emptied in the aftermath of the widespread application of the “say nothing of sin” memo. No indeed, it must be honey and no vinegar, ever.

It is interesting that Simon Peter, though clear and bold about sin, did not seem to cause this angry alienation feared by many modern priests. In his Acts 2 sermon we read not of alienation but of mass conversion:

When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?” Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”With many other words he warned them; and he pleaded with them, “Save yourselves from this corrupt generation.” Those who accepted his message were baptized, and about three thousand were added to their number that day. (Acts 2:37-41)

Wow, this is not the predicted results of some of the fearful and dovish “do-no-harm-ever” preachers and liturgists of today. Peter’s nets were nearly breaking with 3,000 converts even after telling them they had crucified Jesus, and further warning them and calling them to repentance and baptism in no uncertain terms.

And after Peter’s ever sterner words of Acts 3 telling us “You killed the Author of life” the numbers grew even more: But many who heard the message believed; so the number of men who believed grew to about five thousand. (Acts 4:4)

Story – Back in the late 60s or early 70s,  a Protestant evangelist named David Wilkerson wrote a book called The Cross and the Switchblade, which described his ministry among the hardened gang members of the inner city. And his ministry was quite abundant in those years, not by a sort of cheesy, sentimental self esteem approach, but by a frank laying out of the issues at hand. In effect he’d appeal to the gang members by telling them that their problem wasn’t that they had enemies, or didn’t have enough weapons. No their problem was that they were sinning, and that their only hope was to turn their lives over to Jesus Christ, or they were going be forever lost. Jail, or an untimely death was the least of their problems.

Now you’d think he’d get killed talking like that to gang members. Be he didn’t. They knew, deep down, that he was right. And even those who weren’t ready to convert had a respect for him that he spoke the truth, and was bold enough to make it plain.

Somewhere along the line modern preachers, (many, but not all) lost their edge. The Gospel, the good news of salvation, really doesn’t make a lot of sense without reference to sin. To say that we are saved, points to the question, “Saved from what?” And without a vigorous understanding of the sin, and ultimate Hell we have been saved from, the Gospel starts to seem peripheral, optional, a nice story, but not really all that crucial or urgent. The good news is highlighted by and makes sense in the light of the bad news. Only if I know that “I got it bad and that aint good” does the news of a cure dawn as wonderful and even fabulous news.

It is true that we live in dainty times, where people are easily offended, and thin-skinned. But I must also say that I have found that speaking clearly about sin, the need for repentance, and the glory of mercy is experienced by most people as refreshing. Good preaching needs an edge to be compelling. Abstractions, generalities, and hallmark greeting sentiments don’t really win the day or seal the deal. Chatty sermons, dumb jokes, beige Catholicism, and soft tones offer little that is compelling. Our empty churches say that loud and clear.

Some will inevitably take offense, but that has always been the case. A good preacher, it seems, who is worth his salt needs to be willing to get killed, or at least to get it with both barrels. Timid preachers are only a little better than useless. They are, as Gregory the Great said, “Dumb dogs that cannot bark.”

So Peter never got the memo, and thank God. As his fruitful example shows, vigorous biblical preaching includes an edgy quality,  dealing with sin, setting it forth plainly, but also in a way that highlights the glory of grace and mercy.

Bottom line, “You killed the author of life!” (I’m talking to you, not the person next to you). And we’ve done it in a thousand ways. But even now, know that Jesus Christ loves you and has mercy on you in abundance, and you can lay hold of this if you will repent and run to him for healing and mercy.

Sinner, don’t let this harvest pass! And die and lose your soul at last.

This entry was posted in Devotion and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to You Killed the Author of Life!” and other unsual sermon content. A reflection on the striking and bold content of the early Kerygma

  1. Toad says:

    “….and don’t you dare mention that missing Mass is a mortal sin, or even let the phrase “mortal sin” escape your lips.”

    What becomes of those who die having missed Mass?
    Eternal damnation? Sorry, not supposed to mention that.


  2. Mimi says:

    Well, Toad, if their missing Mass is a symptom of their decision that God doesn’t actually matter all that much, then eternal damnation would certainly seem to beckon. If, on the other hand, they missed Mass by accident or through unavoidable circumstances, they won’t be damned on that account. 😉


  3. Toad says:

    So. Mimi, the criterion for eternal damnation can be simply not believing in God firmly enough.
    Seems a bit stiff to me.
    But then I’m probably too soft-hearted.


  4. Another excellent piece by Monsignor Pope.

    (But the headline – should it be “unusal sermon” or “unusual sermon”?)


  5. Toad says:




  6. Toad says:




  7. Toad says:

    ” A good preacher, it seems, who is worth his salt needs to be willing to get killed, or at least to get it with both barrels.”

    Is Toad willing to get killed? Probably not. ”I am not willing to die for my beliefs. They might be wrong.” said Bertrand Russell. Sounds reasonable.
    But Toad also notices that his comment at 11.19 a.m. yesterday was the last comment made before this one.
    Is he the only one sufficiently interested in CP&S to respond, even if his responses are inane?


  8. Roger says:

    This is a quote from Maria Valtortas work
    “ make you acquainted with the mystery of Judas, that mystery which is the fall of a spirit that God had favored in an extraordinary manner. A mystery that is repeated too often and is the wound that aches in the Heart of your Jesus.
    To let you know how people fall changing from servants and sons of God into demons and deicides, who kill the God in them by killing Grace, so that such knowledge may prevent you from setting foot on the paths from which one falls into the Abyss, and it may teach you how to behave when trying to hold back the imprudent lambs that push on towards the abyss. Apply your intelligence to study the horrible and yet common figure of Judas, a complex in which are agitated like snakes all the capital vices that you find and have to fight in this or that person. It is the most important lesson to be learned by you, because it is the one that will me more useful to you in your ministry of spiritual masters and directors. How many people, in every state of life, imitate Judas giving themselves to Satan and meeting eternal death! ..”

    The Fall of a spirit that God had favoured in an extrodinary manner.
    This applied to the Jews of course and applies to Roman Catholics. That this is possible was revealed at La Sallete and Garabandal, Fatima.
    England in 16th century and France in 18th century.
    What is an imprudent Lamb? One who considers that mortal sins are of little consequence? Missing Mass for instance?
    Mortal Sins are the killing of Grace.

    As for people being easily offended this is a reflection of Self interests (Human Rights) against the ivine.
    Human Rights that legalise Capitol Vices! Laws that legalise eternal Death are spiritual suicide!!
    Gay Marriage is a mockery of the Holy Family. It is a Blasphemous and Satanic attack on the Trinity.


  9. Mimi says:

    Toad said:
    “‘I am not willing to die for my beliefs. They might be wrong.’ said Bertrand Russell. Sounds reasonable. ”

    It doesn’t sound reasonable to me. It sounds pathetic and cowardly. I reckon that anyone who is not willing to die for their beliefs in fact has no beliefs at all, only a selfish self-interest.


  10. johnhenrycn says:

    Toad’s got deep beliefs, I think. But he’s in a state of anguish, I also think.

    Heavenly Father, I pray – watch over all those who I love, and all those who they love, thinking especially tonight of Moratinos. Protect him, and all of us, from evil and from serious harm, according to thy will, I beseech thee. And when this day draws to a close, I pray that all of us, through lives of truth, service and love, will have drawn closer to thee and thy heavenly kingdom.


  11. johnhenrycn says:

    GC, that Catholic Stand website, which I’ve saved and which you linked on another thread, seems interesting. You often link worthwhile sites. So sorry to read about your twin sister, but hope she’s alright now.


  12. golden chersonnese says:

    Thanks, johnhenry, she is doing very well.

    Yes it’s a good site all right with new material on average a couple of hours a day on all the brainy topic areas. It says it serves the New Evangelisation and its stable of writers is large indeed. The articles are usually quite easy to read and follow, though Toad admitted to at least a little difficulty


  13. Toad says:

    Well Toad would have a little difficulty, wouldn’t he?
    He sure ain’t Wittgenstein, or even Bertie Russell (he of little faith.)

    Anyway, he likes the name.(of the website, that is.)


  14. Toad says:

    ”Timid preachers are only a little better than useless. They are, as Gregory the Great said, “Dumb dogs that cannot bark.” ”

    Dumb dogs generally bark more frequently than smart ones. And as the dumb one is barking, the smart one sneaks off with the bone.

    (A lesson for us all there, Toad in particular, surely?)

    A little parable, in fact. Burrolikes them.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s