Statement on the passing of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act

17/07/2013 3:44 pm

Statement by the President and Vice-President of the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales

In receiving Royal Assent, the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act marks a watershed in English law and heralds a profound social change. This fact is acknowledged by both advocates and opponents of the Act.

Marriage has, over the centuries, been publicly recognised as a stable institution which establishes a legal framework for the committed relationship between a man and a woman and for the upbringing and care of their children. It has, for this reason, rightly been recognised as unique and worthy of legal protection.

The new Act breaks the existing legal links between the institution of marriage and sexual complementarity. With this new legislation, marriage has now become an institution in which openness to children, and with it the responsibility on fathers and mothers to remain together to care for children born into their family unit, are no longer central. That is why we were opposed to this legislation on principle.

Along with others, we have expressed real concern about the deficiencies in the process by which this legislation came to Parliament, and the speed with which it has been rushed through. We are grateful particularly therefore to those Parliamentarians in both Houses who have sought to improve the Bill during its passage, so that it enshrines more effective protection for religious freedom.

A particular concern for us has also been the lack of effective protection for Churches which decide not to opt-in to conducting same sex marriages. Amendments made in the House of Lords though have significantly strengthened the legal protections in the Act for the Churches. We also welcome the Government’s amendment to the Public Order Act which makes it clear beyond doubt that “discussion or criticism of marriage which concerns the sex of the parties to the marriage shall not be taken of itself to be threatening or intended to stir up hatred”. Individuals are therefore protected from criminal sanction under the Public Order Act when discussing or expressing disagreement with same sex marriage.

In other respects, however, the amendments we suggested have not been accepted. We were concerned to provide legislative clarity for schools with a religious character. This was in order to ensure that these schools will be able to continue to teach in accordance with their religious tenets. Given the potential risk that future guidance given by a Secretary of State for education regarding sex and relationships education could now conflict with Church teaching on marriage, we were disappointed that an amendment to provide this clarity was not accepted. The Minister made clear in the House of Lords, however, that in “having regard” to such guidance now or in the future schools with a religious character can “take into account other matters, including in particular relevant religious tenets”, and that “having regard to a provision does not mean that it must be followed assiduously should there be good reason for not doing so”. These assurances go some way to meeting the concerns we and others expressed.

We were disappointed that a number of other amendments to safeguard freedom of speech and the rights of civil registrars to conscientious objection were not passed. But Ministerial assurances have been made that no one can suffer detriment or unfavourable treatment in employment because she or he holds the belief that marriage can only be between a man and a woman.

The legal and political traditions of this country are founded on a firm conviction concerning the rights of people to hold and express their beliefs and views, at the same time as respecting those who differ from them. It is important, at this moment in which deeply held and irreconcilable views of marriage have been contested, to affirm and strengthen this tradition.

About Gertrude

Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
This entry was posted in Bishops Conference of England & Wales and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Statement on the passing of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act

  1. Giovanni A. Cattaneo says:

    Weak lack luster comments without any power of believe behind it. Which of course is consistent with the majority of the English prelates. It’s truly disgusting.


  2. Roger says:

    As Garbandal pointed out many Cardinals, Bishops and Priests are on the road to Hell and taking many souls with them. If St Peter and St Paul had been Yes men there wouldn’t be a Church! At this time I recommend reading St Vincent Ferrer’s sermons. He is called the Angel of the Apocalypse and his account of St Francis and St Dominic’s vision of the three spears is very relevant to these times.


  3. walthamsow says:

    The road to hell is paved with good intentions – usually of the ignorant /stupid or/and self interested.


  4. kathleen says:

    Contrast the above feeble response of our bishops to that of Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Illinois, USA in the same situation: “The Supreme Court’s rulings on same-sex ‘marriage’ have granted the cover of law to an intrinsic evil through the raw exercise of judicial power.”

    Now that’s what one would call courageous straight talk!!
    He compared the recent High Court’s decision to strike down ‘section 3’ of DOMA (“Defense of Marriage Act”) which states that marriage is the union between one man and one woman, to the infamous Roe v. Wade decision that legalised abortion.
    He said that in both cases the rulings were “absolutely devoid of moral authority”. He called on all people of Faith to reject this decision and to bear witness to the values of true marriage in spite of the Court’s ruling.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s