Bishop Mark Davies: Assisted Suicide Bill Will Put Lives of Many Vulnerable People at Risk

From zenit.0rg:

Legislation Proposes Licensing Doctors to Supply Lethal Drugs to Those With Less Than Six Months to Live

An English bishop has warned that a bill to legalise assisted suicide may inadvertently lead to the deaths of large numbers of vulnerable people.

Bishop Mark Davies of Shrewsbury says that Lord Falconer’s Assisted Dying Bill, due to receive its Second Reading in the House of Lords on July 18, will diminish the legal protection for some of the weakest members of society.

Bishop Davies, who will warn the faithful of the Bill’s implications in a pastoral letter to the Catholics of his Diocese this weekend, says it will be “impossible to predict” the unforeseen consequences of such a change in the law, adding that “in 1967, the politicians who legalised the killing of unborn children in limited and exceptional circumstances did not foresee how violating the sanctity of human life would lead to the wanton destruction of millions of lives”.

It is “incomprehensible”, Bishop Davies will say, that politicians are considering a law which will diminish the protection of the aged and seriously ill at a time when there has been such widespread concern about the ill-treatment of patients and residents in some of the country’s hospitals and care homes.

His letter, whose full contents are below, will be read out at Masses throughout the Diocese of Shrewsbury over the weekend of Sunday June 29, the Feast of the Apostles Ss Peter and Paul.

***

A PASTORAL LETTER

On the Great Challenge for our Generation

To be read at Mass in all the churches and chapels of the Diocese on the Solemnity of Ss Peter & Paul, 29th June 2014

My dear brothers and sisters,

I write to you on the Feast of the Apostles Peter and Paul, when we hear in the Gospel the great promise of Our Lord to Simon Peter:

“You are Peter and on this rock I will build my Church.  And the gates of the underworld shall not prevail against it” (Mt 16:18).

The past century has been marked by the emergence of inhuman ideologies and such unprecedented bloodshed and destruction that it often seemed as if “the gates of hell” had prevailed. However, the Successors of St Peter in the Holy See of Rome have stood at the forefront of the defence of human life, the defence of the value of every human person. They have proclaimed the Gospel of Life in the face of what Saint John Paul II described as, “the culture of death”. Today, that culture of death is manifested in the hidden destruction of the unborn on an industrial scale, and the threat to the sick and the aged of a killing, which its advocates perversely call “mercy.”

Pope Francis continues this unfailing witness in our time, by his words and gestures affirming the eternal value of every human being, especially the weakest and the frailest. In his most recent Exhortation, the Holy Father asks us to be attentive to the new forms of poverty and vulnerability.  Pope Francis specifically speaks of those elderly people

who are increasingly isolated and abandoned” and of the unborn children “the most defenceless and innocent among us” (Evangelii Gaudium n. 210, 213).

I don’t need to remind you of the widespread concern about the ill-treatment of the aged and those at the end of life in some of our care homes and hospitals – and this in spite of the many dedicated people working in these fields of care. It seems all the more incomprehensible, then, that we would be considering a change in the law to diminish the protection given to those most vulnerable.

Next month a Bill to legalize “assisted suicide” for those at the end of life will begin its passage through Parliament. This legislation will be presented as a “compassionate” measure, whose sole aim is to relieve the suffering of the sick and the aged. Yet, it is far from compassionate to remove the legal protections provided for some of the most vulnerable members of society. The proposed change to our laws will license doctors to supply lethal drugs to assist the deaths of those expected to live for six months or less. If Parliament allows exceptions to the laws which protect the very sanctity of human life, it would be impossible to predict where this will end. In 1967, the politicians who legalised the killing of unborn children in limited and exceptional circumstances did not foresee how violating the sanctity of human life would lead to the wanton destruction of millions of lives. It is not surprising that many vulnerable people, including those with disabilities, are today worried by Lord Falconer’s “assisted dying” Bill. It might sound reasonable to speak of “choices at the end of life” – as the campaigners for euthanasia do – but what choice will be left for many?

The recent commemorations of D-day have reminded us of how an earlier generation was ready to face death in the defence of human life and dignity, in what Britain’s war-time Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, described as a battle for the survival of “Christian civilisation” (House of Commons, 18th June 1940). It is the Christian faith which has led us to recognise the sanctity of every human life, the value of every human person. In their quest for the elusive definition of “British values”, our political leaders need look no further for the foundations of our society. And whilst we recall the heroism of generations before us, we must not fail to recognise the great challenge for our own generation. We are now being called upon to defend the sanctity of human life amidst the growing threats against it.

Defending the value of the life and dignity of every human person, from their conception until their natural death, represents the great battle of our life-times, a battle we must fight with the weapons of peace. Together with Pope Francis, the Successor of the Apostle Peter, may you and I be able finally to repeat the words of the Apostle Paul:

have fought the good fight to the end; I have run the race to the finish; I have kept the faith …” (II Tim 4:7).

May it be so, for each one of us. With my blessing,
+ Mark

Bishop of Shrewsbury

This entry was posted in Bishop Mark Davies, Catholic Moral Teaching, Church Teachings, Pope Francis I, Pro Life and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Bishop Mark Davies: Assisted Suicide Bill Will Put Lives of Many Vulnerable People at Risk

  1. johnhenrycn says:

    Bishop Davies’ pastoral letter refers to legally “assisted suicide”. There’s another jurisdiction – Quebec – where similar legislation was passed earler this month. Over here, the euphemism of choice was “Medically Assisted Dying” until its proponents realized what its acronym would be.

  2. Toad says:

    “Bishop Davies… … says it will be “impossible to predict” the unforeseen consequences of such a change in the law.”
    …So it will be. The consequences will probably turn out to be beneficial in some cases, but not in others. Like many such things.

    “An English bishop has warned that a bill to legalise assisted suicide may inadvertently lead to the deaths of large numbers of vulnerable people.”
    I suppose the change in the law of 1896, making it no longer necessary to have a man with a red flag walk in front of your motor car, also inadvertently led to the deaths of large numbers of vulnerable people.
    Hard to know what to do, sometimes, isn’t it?

  3. Toad says:

    I wouldn’t regard “assisted suicide” as a euphemism, myself.
    I suppose you could call it, “..helping people kill themselves,” if that is considered more accurate.
    Both work for me.
    I think MAD is rather good. Used to stand for Mutually Assured Destruction, of course. So it’s apt enough.
    Either way – as Keynes famously said – “…in the long run, we’re all dead.”

  4. johnhenrycn says:

    Tut, tut, Toad – I may have misused eponymous recently on another thread, but I did not say “assisted suicide” was a euphemism. I said that “medically assisted dying” was.

  5. johnhenrycn says:

    …but Toad, you said on another thread today that one of your pastimes in your dotage is painting. I would love to see one of them, if you can see your way clear to posting it. I promise not refer to it as “appalling”, like someone did about the holy card illustration on the last thread. You might be surprised at the reaction you get.

  6. Toad says:

    I see now, JH. Yes, I misread you. Mea culpa. Sorry.

    I am fortunate in that I “paint,”* entirely for myself. I’m doing it now, at 4.30 a.m.
    Only the other day, a pilgrim lady said, “Why don’t you sell them?”
    “Because I don’t like them, usually, and I can’t be bothered, ” was my surly reply. I might have added that I generally think them too appalling to be allowed out.
    Anyway, once they are “finished,” I lose interest in them.

    *They are often “constructions” involving wood and cardboard. (arte povera-ish.”)

  7. johnhenrycn says:

    “Arte Povera-ish” ?
    http://image.invaluable.com/housePhotos/christies/38/109638/H0027-L03250577.jpg?h=2ACE7751E473E3499F63EDF6E296EDE1&cn=AFTOKEN-PROD

    And you have the appalling cheek to call holy cards appalling?

  8. Toad says:

    …ish, JH, ish.

    http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2012/jan/15/alberto-burri-form-matter-review

    …More along these lines, though, I agree, though equally appalling to many on CP&S, no doubt.
    However, we are surely going off at an even wider tangent than usual, here.
    Back to God, I suggest!
    Hearts, doilies and all!

  9. Pingback: The Catholic synod on the family and abortion | From guestwriters

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s