Poland responds to Eurocrat critics

By Stefano Gennarini

NEW YORK, June 24  C-Fam (Centre for Family and Human Rights)

_59715240_poland-eu2-apThe Polish government snapped back at European bureaucrats in a scathing response to a report published last week by the Council of Europe that criticized Poland’s restrictive abortion law and its treatment of women.

Donning the ceremonial tone and submissive deference that many countries adopt in their interface with international bureaucrats, Poland accused the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Latvian-American Nils Muižnieks, of “overstepping his mandate,” of bias and selectivity, and interfering in internal affairs in an official response to a report of the Commissioner published last week.

In a section on “sexual and reproductive health” the Commissioner’s report instructs Poland to decriminalize abortion, remove conscience protections for doctors and medical personnel, and enact mandatory comprehensive sexuality education.

Instead of bowing obsequiously as is commonly assumed nations will do in such situations, Poland replied that the Commissioner had his facts wrong, and that he both misunderstood Polish law and the obligation of Poland under the European Convention on Human Rights.

“Polish law in this regard has its sources in the Constitution and is conditioned by a widely shared care of Polish society for the respect for life,” was Poland’s specific response on the issue of abortion.

The Commissioner also suggested, on the basis of reports from International Planned Parenthood Federation, that Poland was somehow preventing women from accessing contraceptives because it would not subsidize certain contraceptives.

The Polish government accused Planned Parenthood of self-interest for seeking financial profit from the sale of contraceptive drugs.

International Planned Parenthood Federation “can hardly be called an impartial source of information in the light of its active involvement in promoting access to contraception and abortion, and its roles in facilitating direct access to such services,” the Polish government said.

But Poland’s harshest criticism of the European human rights bureaucracy was in the section on women’s equal rights, which took up approximately one third of the report.

The Commissioner’s report accused Poland of holding back women from economic and public life, and failing to criminalize and prosecute violence and sexual harassment perpetrated on women—smears commonly leveled against countries that protect life in the womb.

Poland said the Commissioner was merely parroting poor information provided by a few organizations that are hardly representative of civil society in the entirety of the country and “completely ignoring” the information provided by the government. The Polish response compared this uncritical repetition of unverified opinions “not based on facts” to the game “Chinese whisperers” in which a message is delivered incorrectly after a series of translations.

It called such accusations “ideological” and “off the mark,” highlighting data showing that Poland has some of the lowest rates of domestic violence and of sexual harassment in the workplace in all of Europe.

Poland also pointed to OECD data showing that, among other things, in Poland the gender pay gap is among the smallest in Europe at only 10.6%, less than Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Norway, that Poland has the second-largest share of women investors, and that the ratio for female Parliamentarians stands at 27.4% which is comparable to the average for Europe of 28.58%.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Poland responds to Eurocrat critics

  1. Robert says:

    Well here is the problem facing Poland within EU.

    “..
    If a couple were to marry in Belgium, Spain, Portugal or Sweden where same-sex marriage is possible, the EU will say that they have to be given the same legal rights in whichever member state they then chose to live – even if that state itself opposes the introduction of same-sex marriage. In essence the Berlinguer Report seeks to establish an EU-wide right to same-sex marriage.
    ..”

    Believed to be why Cameron introduced same sex marriage in Britain.

    Now the EU will require the same rights to be given in whatever State a member chooses to live. This will included Abortion.

  2. The Raven says:

    *Sigh* Council of Europe ≠ European Union.

    THEY ARE ENTIRELY SEPARATE INSTITUTIONS!

  3. Robert says:

    “..
    But the European Union has its own, entirely separate, court system in Luxembourg. Its formal title is the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) but it’s also known as European court of justice.
    The main job of the CJEU is to interpret EU law and make sure it’s applied in the same way in all EU countries. Another important role is to decide legal disputes between EU institutions and member governments.
    ..”

  4. Tom Fisher says:

    Many thanks for posting this article. Fascinating

  5. The Raven says:

    Yes, Roger, the ECJ is a thing. It’s role is to rule on EU law. None of the matters set out in this article fall within the purview of EU law. The ECJ rules mainly on questions of state aid to companies, tariff definitions and VAT.

  6. kathleen says:

    Instead of bowing obsequiously as is commonly assumed nations will do in such situations,..

    Ouch! But nail firmly and squarely on head.
    That is exactly what most kowtowing nations of Europe will do with these mandates from these secular, godless European organisations, whether they be the Council of Europe, the EU, the ECHR, the CJEU, or whatever.

    Are Poland (and Hungary too, let’s remember) to be the only European countries with the sheer guts and moral integrity to stand up and refuse to have these despicable evils forced down their throats? Are they to be the only countries to stand for Christendom’s divinely-inspired laws?
    (I follow The Raven’s argument that the EU is not to be confused with the other European bureaucratic commissions, but the Brexit outcome won’t change anything for the UK here; British politicians go along with this tide of flagrantly anti-Christian laws just as much as all the other European nations’ governments.)

  7. Roger says:

    Yes Kathleen
    It was UKIP that said that Cameron’s Gay marriage Bill (private members never present to electorate) was forced from Europe. I read that the same applied to Italy. So what is the Truth?? The threat was being sued through European Court(s) for Human Rights??
    I appreciate what Raven has written but that still leaves huge unanswered questions.

  8. johnhenrycn says:

    I agree with Fur Face; this is a welcome report, but the second paragraph needs correction.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s