Bishop calls for rituals to bless adultery and sodomy

modern familyPosted on  on Father Z’s Blog:

What follows should make EVERY CATHOLIC angry.  There is no left or right or anything else in this.  If you are Catholic, this should make you angry.  If you read Patheos, or Rorate, or Aletheia you should be angry and, frankly, alarmed.

A few years ago, this would have been dismissed as science fiction.  Now it is real.

As decentralization continues, could this come to a diocese near you?

This distressing item was in my email this morning.  From Belgium, via “la Revue de presse succincte de l’archevêché de Malines-Bruxelles” bad news: HERE  (my fast translation):

In “De Gazet van Antwerpen” (6/10, p. 8)

Monsignor Bonny, Bishop of Antwerp, wants a ritual for gays and cohabiting in a telling passage from the book “”Puis-je? Merci. Désolé”” (Can I? Thank you. Sorry.) a free dialogue about relationships, marriage and family published by Lannoo and to come out this October 11th. The bishop of Antwerp expresses himself, thinking aloud about new religious rituals. Bonny wrote the book with Roger Burggraeve and Ilse Van Halst. “The question is whether we should include everything in a single model,” says Bonny. [That’s code for changing the definition of matrimony.] “Should we not develop into a diversity of rituals in which we can recognize the relationship between homosexuals from a believing and ecclesial perspective?” [To bless sodomy?]Similarly, the attitude towards divorced persons engaged in a new relationship would necessitate a different approach. Bonny believes that the Church, in some cases, could bless a second relationship. “For a long time, the Orthodox Church practices the confirmation of a new relationship for reasons of mercy[“Say the magic word, win a hundred dollars!”] which enables you as a new couple to rediscover a place in the community. Nevertheless, this new blessing is not repeating or substitute sacramental first marriage. Which was and remains unique. [Safe to say.  What else could any relationship between two people be?]

This is sly.

Granted that this is only a blurb about a book, but you can see in the blurb what is going on.

Consider a couple in which at least one Catholic partner is civilly divorced and remarried without a declaration of nullity.  There are good enough reasons for them to cohabit (e.g., raising children… you know the drill by now).  They say they will commit themselves to live in continence as brother and sister, best of friends, etc.  The Church works with them, as the Church always works with every soul who desires holiness and heaven.  The buzz word is now “accompany”.  It may happen that, being in proximity, a near occasion of sin, they slip and have relations, but they repent, go to confession, and try again.

What the bishop does is blend in with that scenario, the case of a homosexual couple.  Another way of seeing long-term, “committed” homosexual relationships which involve sexual activity is friendship gone terribly astray.  It’s a gross distortion of friendship.  The fact of their same-sex attraction make their cohabitation an occasion of sin.  However, maybe there are reasons for them to live together.  So, they commit themselves to live in continence, as if they were brothers, the best of friends, etc. The Church works with them, as the Church always works with every soul who desires holiness and heaven. The buzz word is now “accompany”.  It may happen that, being in proximity, a near occasion of sin, they slip and have relations, but they repent, go to confession, and try again.

This seems to me that what that bishop is proposing is full, cringing capitulation to the world and baser appetites.  The Church should inspire and help people to move from sin to grace, to conversion, and to support them in the suffering that conversion entails as they do.  The cobbling up of rites which in any way resemble a blessing of an adulterous or actively homosexual relationship is a mockery of matrimony as intended by God.  Such blessings or rites would surely erode the understanding that Catholics have of marriage and would send crossed, confused signals to the world watching the Church, which is in effect the last bastion of moral teaching in a degenerate age.

This takes the Kasperite solution to the next, logical step.

We must be on guard to remain the Catholic Church, and not become the Precious Snowflake Church.

Ed. The push for this continues in the Church in Germany too

See also: Bishop Bonny sent out for united mission

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Bishop calls for rituals to bless adultery and sodomy

  1. JabbaPapa says:

    The Netherlands and Flemish Belgium are the only places in the world where the sex abuse stuff was actually institutionalised all the way “up” to the hierarchy.

    The Netherlands scandal was so grotesquely evil that not even the anti-catholic liberal press could stomach reporting it honestly to the general public ; and the Flemish Dioceses in Belgium were contaminated by those demonic practices to a significant degree.

    It is very distressing but also sadly unsurprising to see such evil doctrines being proposed by the false priests of that region.

    Vices are incapable of being blessed, and those who pretend to do so are simply trail-blazing a pathway to Hell.

  2. So what’s next? Are priests going to “accompany” serial killers, mafiosi, embezzlers, car thieves, and so forth, until they “rediscover a place in the community”? Oh joy! Oh, amoris laetitia!

  3. Toad says:

    Surely not necessary to “bless” sodomy? – better just not to stand in the way.

  4. mmvc says:

    Now Jozef De Kesel, protégé of Cardinal Danneels, is in line for a red hat :

    http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/pope-appoints-radical-liberal-as-new-archbishop

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-appoints-well-known-progressive-and-protege-of-cardinal-danneels-to-ma

    http://www.torchofthefaith.com/news.php?extend.1101

    From Rorate Caeli:

    Abp. Jozef De Kesel (69), protege of Cardinal Danneels and prominent Kasperite, was appointed less than a year ago as Archbishop of Mechlin-Brussels. In that short period he has made himself notorious for his suppression of the flourishing — and conservative — Fraternity of the Holy Apostles, which was founded by no less than his more orthodox predecessor, Archbishop Leonard, whose marginalization is now complete.

    Our Lady of Banneux, pray for Belgium!

  5. kathleen says:

    Now, tell me honestly… How can Pope Francis allow this to happen? Can he not see how heterodox and un-Catholic these prelates are? Does he not care? Really, words fail me.

    But hold on and wait for the defenders of the Pope to come rushing in once more to make excuses for him!

    But what about the flock being left to the mercy of these ravenous wolves?? What good to them will “excuses” be?

  6. Roger says:

    POPE FRANCIS TOLD REPORTERS TO LOOK TO SCHONBORN’S INTERPRETATION OF THE DOCUMENT

    “..
    Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, whom Pope Francis has specifically indicated as an authoritative interpreter of his exhortation. The pope not only selected Schönborn to present Amoris Laetitia at the Vatican press conference on the day of its release, but later told reporters to look to Schönborn’s interpretation of the document.
    ..”

    SCANDALS AND SCANDALIZE. THE BODY OF COURSE IS THE CHURCH.

    Matthew 5
    29 And if thy right eye scandalize thee, pluck it out and cast it from thee. For it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell.
    30 And if thy right hand scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee: for it is expedient for thee that one of thy members should perish, rather than that thy whole body be cast into hell.

    Matthew 18
    6 But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea.

    Mark 9
    41 And whosoever shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me; it were better for him that a millstone were hanged around his neck, and he were cast into the sea.

    Luke 17
    2 It were better for him, that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should scandalize one of these little ones.

  7. JabbaPapa says:

    Cardinal Christoph Schönborn, whom Pope Francis has specifically indicated as an authoritative interpreter of his exhortation. The pope not only selected Schönborn to present Amoris Laetitia at the Vatican press conference on the day of its release, but later told reporters to look to Schönborn’s interpretation of the document.

    The Pope was referring to one text (in Italian, BTW) by the Cardinal, not to the entirety of all he’s ever said.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s