Climate of fear in Vatican is very real


By Steve Jalsevac, December 16, 2016, LifeSiteNews

Our Nov. 16-23 visit to Rome was the most dramatic of many such twice-per-year work trips we have taken there during the past 10 years. After meeting with cardinals, bishops and other Vatican agency and dicastery staff, John-Henry Westen, our new Rome reporter, Jan Bentz, and I saw a consistent pattern of widespread anxiety and very real fear among faithful Church servants. We have never encountered this before.

Many were afraid of being removed from their positions, fired from their jobs in Vatican agencies or of encountering severe public or private reprimands and personal accusations from those around the pope or even from Francis himself. They are also fearful and anxious about the great damage being done to the Church and being helpless to stop it.

Near the end of our visit, one very high-level cleric confirmed our observations. He added, “One can sense the fear. It is tangible.” Another, who has always been willing to discuss difficult situations, immediately told us that he would not talk, even off the record, in confidence, about any of the current controversies. We were told not to ask him any questions about these things. By the end of that visit we were able to broach one of the controversies and the important information unknown to him was appreciated.

From left to right, LifeSite Editor-in-Chief/co-founder John-Henry Westen, Rome correspondent Jan Bentz and LifeSite president/co-founder Steve Jalsevac during Nov. 16-23 visit to Rome. St. Peter’s is in background. LifeSiteNews

The release of the dubia letter by the now known to be six brave cardinals, quietly supported by at least 20 to 30 other cardinals, has clearly sparked a heightened atmosphere of intimidation and fear in the Vatican.

On Nov. 23 LSN journalist Pete Baklinski reported that Bishop Athanasius Schneider said he had “great astonishment” for what he called the “unusually violent and intolerant” nature of the backlash, adding that such reaction runs contrary to the Pope’s call for “dialogue and acceptance of a legitimate plurality of opinions.”

The Francis papacy has created a radically different climate in Rome from that of Pope St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI, under whom Rome was a vastly more welcoming place for Catholic Culture of Life warriors such as ourselves.

Another Nov. 23 story reported that Cardinals Burke and Pell were officially removed from the Congregation for Divine Worship and that “the office’s membership was recently gutted, with numerous progressives appointed as replacements.” This has effectively left the strongly orthodox Cardinal Sarah, the congregation’s head, a neutralized, silenced figurehead.

Cardinal Ouellet, head of the Congregation of Bishops, has also been left with little real authority, with progressive, Francis-appointed underlings now having the greater say on who becomes a bishop. The bishops being appointed now are generally tending to be of the most radically liberal views, such as now Cardinals Cupich and Farell and San Diego Bishop Robert McElroy. And of course, Cardinal Pell has been prevented from continuing his greatly needed reforms of Vatican financial institutions and procedures still rife with corruption (that information comes from an impeccable source).

The Academy for Life, originally personally founded by Pope St. John Paul II and the also saintly Dr. Jerome Lejeune, has been drastically changed and Kasperite bishop,  Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, has been chosen by Pope Francis to be the new head.

The original requirement by St. John Paul II and Dr Lejeune that members must sign a declaration that they uphold the Church’s pro-life teachings has been removed, the mandate of the Academy has been changed to a seamless-garment type that will now include a focus on the environment. The life-long memberships of the many distinquished original members of the Academy have been revoked. It is likely no coincidence that this was done considering that a significant number of those original members, dear friends of John Paul II and Dr Lejeune,  have been among the severest and more capable lay critics of Pope Francis.

Claire Chretien reported on Nov. 23 that Pope Francis has praised the 1960s German moral theologian Bernard Häring, one of the most prominent dissenters from Pope Paul VI’s 1968 encyclical Humanae Vitae, for his new morality, which the pope said helped “moral theology to flourish.”

Can you imagine the impact of that act by Francis on all those in the Vatican curia and agencies, and on pastors around the world, who were all taught to strongly defend Humanae Vitae by St. Pope John Paul II and Benedict? What will happen to them now, in the current climate of severe intimidation, if they continue what was natural to them for decades in union with the Catholic magisterial teaching on the issue of contraception – teaching going back to the very beginning of the Church?

In his editorial in the upcoming December issue of LifeSite’s Faithful Insight magazine, John-Henry Westen relates more of what we discovered.

“… Catholic universities in Rome are watched and professors’ lectures screened to ensure they fall in line with a liberal interpretation of Amoris Laetitia. Clerics are reported to superiors if they are overheard expressing concerns about Pope Francis. Many are afraid to speak openly, even though in the past they were always very willing. Vatican reporters told us they were warned numerous times not to report on the dubia.”

It is as though Catholic Rome has turned into a type of Church police state because of what is seen to be a great threat from the dubia letter to certain agendas.

In a December 13 article on OnePeterFive, Vatican commentator Maike Hickson stated,

“I have heard reports that the Vatican is like an occupied state. Certain sources I’ve spoken with have a fear that communications with Vatican officials are being monitored; some have even reported suspicious anomalies in their telephone conversations in which, after a dropped call, the audio of the last moments of their conversation has played over and over again on a loop, as though they are hearing a recording. Some individuals who work within the Vatican are advising their contacts on the outside not to share sensitive information via email or their Vatican-issued cell phones. [emphasis added]”

Hickson goes on to quote respected Vatican correspondent Ed Pentin’s response to a question in an extensive interview in titled, “Is there a reign of terror in the Vatican?” Pentin responded,

“The Pope’s reaction, of going so far as to question the [four] cardinals’ mental state, has been read as a manifestation of his own anger at having his agenda taken off course. And instead of taking the four cardinals at their word (they have said they are acting primarily out of charity towards the Holy Father, justice and deep pastoral concern), they are seen as adversaries. I understand he has also been working behind the scenes to ensure his agenda is not thwarted. From strategically placed articles in L’Osservatore Romano to equivocations from those who publicly criticized the dubia when asked if the Pope had asked them to do so, Francis has been acting, as one observer put it, like a “behind-the-scenes political lobbyist.” In the three weeks after the dubia were published, the Pope gave three interviews to the world’s media, each of them aimed at legitimizing his position while denigrating his critics.

Lastly, it’s important to point out that simply by matching facts with words coming from the Pope and his allies, it’s clear there is significant lying and deceit taking placeas well as calumnies and the besmirching of reputations of those labeled to be “on the right” just because they are publicly critical of Amoris Laetitia, or merely report on such criticism. It genuinely pains me to say all this, because as a Catholic journalist one doesn’t wish in any way to diminish the Petrine Office, but I feel I have an obligation to report the facts on what is happening. [my emphasis].”

These are strong words from this always top-notch Vatican reporter who is normally soft-spoken and very mild-mannered.

Pope Francis was mostly very sombre during the November consistory. Steve Jalsevac/LifeSIte

In another LifeSite article, we reported Bishop Athanasius’ assessment of the deterioration of the situation in Rome,

“The reaction to the dubia is a proof of the climate in which we actually live in the Church right now,” Bishop Schneider said. “We live in a climate of threats and of denial of dialogue towards a specific group.”

Schneider went on to say that “dialogue seems to be accepted only if you think like everyone else – that is practically like a regime.”

Schneider brought up his experience in Russia, where he was born in the time of the Soviet Union. His parents were sent by Stalin to work camps, or “Gulags,” after the Second World War. “If you didn’t follow the line of the party, or you questioned it, you couldn’t even ask. That is for me a very clear parallel to what is happening now in the reactions to the dubia – questions – of the Cardinals.”

At a small press scrum with Cardinal Cupich at the North American College immediately after the consistory, there was an incident related to my question to Cupich on behalf of LifeSite.

After the newly installed cardinal’s unsatisfactory answers to two questions from Ed Pentin, I was given the nod. While briefly prefacing my question, I was suddenly harshly interrupted by a Vatican press official demanding, “Ask the question!” Considering that the preface was brief, the question was about to be asked and there were only a handful of media persons in the room, the interruption was totally uncalled for.

Small press scrum with Cardinal Cupich after recent consistory. Steve Jalsevac is first person in photo on the right. John-Henry Westen was standing next to him. John-Henry Westen/LifeSite

I immediately asked the question regarding the animosity that respectful questioners of Francis have been enduring and to which the cardinal astonishingly responded by denying any knowledge of such a thing occurring. Then, when John-Henry Westen put up his hand to ask a question, a spontaneous rule was announced by the press official. He refused to allow John-Henry’s question saying that only one question was permitted from each agency.

That sudden ruling caused an uncomfortable stir among the several other media representatives. Four in a row were now also not permitted to ask their questions because of the new rule. When the last one was denied, Cardinal Cupich said, “Why not, since yours is a friendly question?” And so that softball question was permitted.

The growing hostility to faithful media who dare to simply question with respect the actions or statements of those around Pope Francis or of the pope himself was especially highlighted in a December 7 Reuters report.

Reuters stated, “Using precise psychological terms,” Pope Francis “said scandal-mongering media risked falling prey to coprophilia, or arousal from excrement, and consumers of these media risked coprophagia, or eating excrement.”

So now, if the translation is correct, as most of these usually are, if we dare to see and report what are obviously newsworthy developments that do not reflect well on the pope or his close collaborators, we are “scandal-mongering,” “eating excrement” and being sexually aroused by this excrement of reporting uncomfortable truth.

How can a pope, the Vicar of Christ, make such vile accusations? Whatever happened to, “Who am I to judge?”

This article could go on and on, with many more examples, such as our report that retired Roman Catholic Greek bishop Frangiskos Papamanolis ripped the four cardinals for committing the sins of “apostasy” and “scandal,” saying they receive Holy Communion “sacrilegiously” for raising concerns about the pope’s document. Then there was very liberal Cardinal Cupich’s response that the four holy cardinals are “in need of conversion”.

Every day it seems there is more and worse hostility being orchestrated against any who would dare to respectfully support the faithful dubia cardinals, who would dare to respectfully question statements and actions of Pope Francis, and who would dare to mention the crystal clear teachings of Christ’s moral absolutes, wonderfully and thoroughly expounded by Pope St. John Paul II in Familiaris Consortio and Veritatis Splendor.

We have to wonder where all of this is going. It is deeply, deeply concerning. The common phrase we kept hearing that week in Rome is that there is a “war” going on in the Church – a war of the “The Spirit of Vatican II” progressives against the orthodox Catholics. One person after another shockingly used that word.

I have never experienced anything like this in my lifetime and I am sure most, if not all regular LifeSite readers, can say the same thing.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Climate of fear in Vatican is very real

  1. Toad says:

    This kind of thing is in danger of giving journalists a good name on CP&S.


  2. 000rjbennett says:

    “Significant lying and deceit,” writes Edward Pentin (quoted above). There is only one supernatural entity who would run a Church in that way.


  3. Tom Fisher says:

    “Significant lying and deceit,” writes Edward Pentin (quoted above). There is only one supernatural entity who would run a Church in that way.

    RJB now claims the Catholic Church is run by Satan. Ian Paisley would agree. Ian Paisley, of course, was so fanatically anti-Catholic that one is inclined to question his mental health


  4. mmvc says:

    Didn’t someone once say something about the smoke of Satan entering the Church?


  5. Elleblue Jones says:

    Sadly none of what this author says surprises me at all. It seemed every time I went to a Catholic news site or blog, parish priests were being harangued by Pope Francis for one reason or another. It’s a difficult time to be a Roman Catholic priest and we should be praying daily for all of them. I didn’t trust Francis from the beginning and know I understand why. I have never thought of myself as a ‘traditional Catholic’ and yet since his papacy began that is what I have become. I respect the office of the Pope and yet I no longer respect this man and his minions.


  6. johnhenrycn says:

    The outrageous (possibly bi-polar) <a href=""<Ann Barnhardt was once uncomfortable with PF whilst still accepting of his papacy; but then she started referring to him as an anti-pope, and now she’s gone completely off the reservation:

    “I believe that Bergoglio is not MERELY an Antipope, but that he may in fact be the False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist, the Anti-John the Baptist, and that these days may well be the run-up to the End Times.”

    Obviously, she’s crackers. Isn’t she?


  7. mmvc says:

    Obviously, she’s crackers. Isn’t she?

    If she is, JH, then she’s not alone. Many seem to be at breaking point (to a greater or lesser degree) with this pontificate. The saddest cases I’ve read and heard about are the ones who feel so betrayed that they distance themselves from the Church. But then there are those who in their confusion and distress find solace in studying the Faith more deeply and turning to Prayer and the Sacraments more fervently.

    Speculations abound, but in all the turmoil we must never lose sight of the Woman Clothed with the Sun who will crush the serpent’s head:

    O Mary conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee!


  8. GC says:

    I must say Blase Cupie looks resplendent in his new robes. Is the meteoric rise in his status purely due to talent or, perhaps, sanctity, or is there some other more subtle reason that I’m missing here?


  9. johnhenrycn says:

    MMVC (16:12) says – “The saddest cases I’ve read and heard about are the ones who feel so betrayed that they distance themselves from the Church.”

    I too have wondered what to do (in addition to praying) as we go down this hill in a hand basket. I cannot imagine ever leaving or distancing myself from the Church, but the current state of affairs is becoming intolerable, and so, I have to think about what recourse – short of exile – there is. There has got to be recourse for Catholics in the pews, but I’m still trying to figure out where and what it is.


  10. toadspittle says:

    Big fun. A ll of it.


  11. johnhenrycn says:

    Re Blase Cardinal Cupich (GC @ 17:06) – I concede he’s possibly a talented button man, but nothing more subtle than that. Even people from the sticks like me know what stacking the deck means.


  12. mmvc says:

    …but I’m still trying to figure out where and what it is.

    I hope and pray you’ll do so soon, JH. A deeper prayer life is one option. It also helps to know that we are not alone in this. We are all part of the Mystical Body of Christ and as such we need to support each other and recognise that neither Our Lord nor Our Heavenly Mother will ever abandon us. When discussing the crisis in the Church with my beloved terminally ill mother, she would often say: “We still have Our Lady and all the Saints of heaven to help us.” Hold on to that too, JH.


  13. johnhenrycn says:

    MMVC: Can you please play this Finnish virsi (hymn) for your mother? It’s offered with a prayer to God for her by a friend. Oi kiitos sä luojani armollinen Oh thank you, Gracious Lord:

    My dear Granny loved hearing this during her last week of life. I played it for her constantly then.


  14. mmvc says:

    Will do, JH. I’ll play it from my iPhone. The cancer in her brain has made her delirious and confused, but she still remembers her prayers and will no doubt be able to appreciate music. That’s why our two musician sons will be taking their violins when we all travel to Germany to be near her and spend time with her in hospital over Christmas. On Wednesday she has to undergo surgery for a badly fractured arm. Thank you for your prayers.

    Oh and may your dear Granny rest in peace!


  15. marysong says:

    I receive the impression that what ” the very liberal ” Blaise Cardinal Cupich meant was that the ” four holy Cardinals “are in need of conversion to Marxism. He simply didn’t finish his sentence.


  16. Tom Fisher says:

    the very liberal ” Blaise Cardinal Cupich meant was that the ” four holy Cardinals “are in need of conversion to Marxism.

    So is he a liberal or a Marxist? They are quite distinct. Your comment doesn’t, on the face of it at least, cohere.


  17. johnhenrycn says:

    (Golly, this Dona Antonia Ferreira Reserva Tawney Porto is good!)
    Perhaps Marysong means liberal socialism or ethical socialism, which I think it’s fair to say is the system of control most of us live under? Which reminds me: R.H.Tawney is the reputed inventor of it. Ethical socialism, that is – not port.


  18. johnhenrycn says:

    …and actually, Marysong reminds me of Dona Antonia, and although I say that to provoke a smile, I also say it with respect.


  19. johnhenrycn says:

    …and the lighthouse near where Marysong lives is far more romantic than the one at Port Prim near the mouth of Digby Gut where my wife ( wife #1, Toad) spent many happy summers as a child.


  20. Tom Fisher says:

    Here, JH, is an intriguing comic scenario where the current wife lives always in the shadow of the next:


  21. johnhenrycn says:

    At the 1:00 mark:

    “Oh Toady, whatever is it? Are you unhappy?
    No, Rebecca, it’s nothing – I was just wondering what my fifth wife is going to be like…”

    Funniest link today. Thanks 🙂


  22. toadspittle says:

    Seconded. If only Toad had the energy for more wives.


  23. kathleen says:

    I’ve said it before (basing my words on those far more savvy and wiser than me) that we are TRULY living in the times of the greatest clash between Good and Evil since The Fall – Satan’s challenge to God witnessed by Pope Leo XIII in his terrifying vision – and this current unconcealed climate of fear in the Vatican is proof of this.

    Much as we would wish to run away or stick our head in the sand, ostrich fashion, from the coming cataclysm (I know I would), we must remember that we Catholics who are living today have been chosen, from the zillions of possible past and future Catholics, to be the courageous ones who, armed with the virtues, the shield of Faith.. the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Holy Spirit… to keep alive the Torch of the Faith as we confront Satan’s army’s greatest attack on Christ’s Church.
    We must pray with great fervour that we do not run away “for fear of the wolves”.


  24. toadspittle says:

    Big Fun, indeed!



Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s