Archbishop Viganò Strikes Again, Targets 1960’s as Start of Abuse Crisis

And we all know what took place during the 1960’s, don’t we?

Five days ago, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò contributed the following statement to the National Catholic Register, which had invited him to be part of a symposium in anticipation of next week’s Vatican summit meeting on the clerical sexual abuse crisis.

Some of Archbishop Viganò’s more vocal traditionalist critics enjoy pointing out that, since His Excellency has been part of the post-conciliar Church, he must be considered part of the problem rather than the solution.  From the moment we reported on the first Viganò letter, we have pushed back against this myopic point of view.

It is interesting to note now, in this latest Viganò letter, that the good Archbishop highlights the years leading up to and including the Second Vatican Council as when sexual abuse in the clergy became a massive problem. The Archbishop also takes a very pre-conciliar position on the admittance of homosexuals to the priesthood. I’d say if we were to scratch the surface of Archbishop Viganò just a bit, we’d find a traditionalist.

You’ll want to read this!

We’ve reproduced the statement below in its entirety:

Despite Grave Problems, the Lord Will Never Abandon His Church

I thank you for inviting me to take part in this symposium on “Abuse and the Way to Healing” in anticipation of the upcoming bishops’ summit at the Vatican. My contribution will draw on my personal experience of 51 years of priesthood.

It is evident to all that a primary cause of the present terrible crisis of sexual abuse committed by ordained clergy, including bishops, is the lack of proper spiritual formation of candidates to the priesthood. That lack, in turn, is largely explained by the doctrinal and moral corruption of many seminary formators, corruption that increased exponentially beginning in the 1960s.

I entered a pontifical seminary in Rome and began my studies at the Gregorian University when I was 25 years old. It was 1965, just months before the end of Vatican II. I couldn’t help but notice, not only in my own college but also in many others in Rome, that some seminarians were very immature and that these houses of formation were marked by a general and very serious lack of discipline.

vigano pull 1

A few examples will suffice. Seminarians sometimes spent the night outside my seminary, as the supervision was woefully inadequate. Our spiritual director was in favor of priestly ordination ad tempus — the idea that ordained priesthood could be a merely temporary status.

At the Gregorian, one of the professors of moral theology favored situation ethics. And some classmates confided to me that their spiritual directors had no objection to their presenting themselves for priestly ordination despite their unresolved and continual grave sins against chastity.

Certainly, those who suffer from deep-seated same-sex attraction should never be admitted to seminary. Moreover, before any seminarian is accepted for ordination, he must not only strive for chastity but actually achieve it. He must already be living chaste celibacy peacefully and for a prolonged period of time, for if this is lacking, the seminarian and his formators cannot have the requisite confidence that he is called to the celibate life.

Bishops have the paramount responsibility for the formation of their candidates to the priesthood. Any bishop who has covered up abuse or seduction of minors, vulnerable adults or adults under a priest’s pastoral care, including seminarians, is not fit for that responsibility or for any episcopal ministry and should be removed from his office.

vigano pull 2

I am praying intensely for the success of the February summit. Although I would rejoice greatly if the summit were successful, the following questions reveal that there is no sign of a genuine willingness to attend to the real causes of the present situation:

  • Why will the meeting focus exclusively on the abuse of minors? These crimes are indeed the most horrific, but the crises in the United States and Chile that have largely precipitated the upcoming summit have to do with abuses committed against young adults, including seminarians, not only against minors. Almost nothing has been said about sexual misconduct with adults, which is itself a grave abuse of pastoral authority, whether or not the relationship was “consensual.”
  • Why does the word “homosexuality” never appear in recent official documents of the Holy See? This is by no means to suggest that most of those with a homosexual inclination are abusers, but the fact remains that the overwhelming majority of abuse has been inflicted on post-pubescent boys by homosexual clerics. It is mere hypocrisy to condemn the abuse and claim to sympathize with the victims without facing up to this fact honestly. A spiritual revitalization of the clergy is necessary, but it will be ultimately ineffectual if it does not address this problem.
  • Why does Pope Francis keep and even call as his close collaborators people who are notorious homosexuals? Why has he refused to answer legitimate and sincere questions about these appointments? In doing so he has lost credibility on his real will to reform the Curia and fight the corruption.

viganoo pull 3

In my third testimony, I begged the Holy Father to face up to the commitments he himself made in assuming his office as Successor of Peter. I pointed out that he took upon himself the mission of confirming his brothers and guiding all souls in following Christ along the way of the cross. I urged him then, and I now urge him again, to tell the truth, repent, show his willingness to follow the mandate given to Peter and, once converted, to confirm his brothers (Luke 22:32).

I pray that the bishops gathered in Rome will remember the Holy Spirit, whom they received with the imposition of hands, and carry out their responsibility to represent their particular Churches by firmly asking for, and insisting on, an answer to the above questions during the summit.

Indeed, I pray that they will not return to their countries without proper answers to these questions, for to fail in this regard would mean abandoning their own flocks to the wolves and allowing the entire Church to suffer dreadful consequences.

Despite the problems I have described, I continue to have hope, because the Lord will never abandon his Church.

Archbishop Carlo Viganò is the former apostolic nuncio to the United States. 

[Source: Michael J. Matt at THE REMNANT]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Archbishop Viganò Strikes Again, Targets 1960’s as Start of Abuse Crisis

  1. Mary Salmond says:

    If Vigano can show up at the conference without being mysteriously poisoned, I have some hope.
    FYI: the third testimony ( in blue) by him said (page could not be found). Can that be refreshed?

    [A Moderator: Sorry Mary, but that link is also defunct at The Remnant, the original site.]

    Like

  2. Crow says:

    Mary, he doesn’t need to turn up. The Vatican symposium is a sham – a PR exercise designed to deflect attention away from the fact that the abuse crisis arose as the result of the admission of homosexuals to the seminaries, after which homosexual networks built up within the Church. While not all homosexuals are paedophiles, the majority of paedophilia is homosexual.The US situation points to the fact that the abuse was the result of the homosexual nature of the priesthood, which arose, in a large part, after 1960.
    Archbishop Viganò, bless his courageous and wonderful soul! Has made the deflection by the corrupt homosexual and financial lobby in the Vatican to make the sexual abuse crisis a crisis of ‘clericalidm’ apparent even to those who close their forensic capacities with the pc narrative.
    The Vatican symposium will proceed as planned, conservative and valuable input will be silenced, and the pope will make motherhood statements about clericalism and perhaps use it as an excuse to shut down some more traditional orders that have growing vocations. He can do all that, but in the meantime, the secular authorities will uncover all the stuff that the Vatican is trying desperately to cover, and Viganò has put it in the record, in terms which allow the honest people in the community to genuinely address the issue. The man is truly a hero. However, I don’t think tradies should be calling him a traditionalist – it makes it easier for the people with shendas to dismiss him by name-calling (‘traditionalist’), thereby turning into a factional squabble within the Church and avoiding dealing with the substance of his account.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Crow says:

    Sorry about the typos.

    Like

  4. Mary Salmond says:

    Crow: Vigano showing up was sort of rhetorical, the poison wasn’t rhetorical. He’s may still need to lie low! All the homos will pounce on him if he shows his face. I appreciate his clarity. And yes, the truth will come to light in due time.
    And yes, the sham symposium will doing nothing, and most bishops will keep quiet.
    Our bishop had a Visioning Session. Then told us the results. It was a joke. I’m sick of the denial and fluff!

    Like

  5. Crow says:

    Viganò is like Zorro!

    Like

  6. Mary Salmond says:

    ☺ Zorro. Or The Invisible Man!

    Like

  7. Crow says:

    Mary I have found a picture of him:

    Great.

    Like

  8. Mary Salmond says:

    😂 Funny!

    Like

  9. Crow says:

    Mary I am so glad you got that!

    Like

  10. Mary Salmond says:

    Crow, I love a good joke!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s