Our Care and Responsibility for Mary

Father Tim Finigan’s old friend, the great Father Z, describes Fr Finigan as “a terrific priest, an outstanding parish priest, and great supporter of renewal of our liturgical worship”. Two months ago Father Z was calling for “prayers and penance” to be offered for his friend who was “quite ill and awaiting the results of some tests. He would much appreciate your prayers”. Fr Finigan is now moving from Margate (in S.E. England), where he was much-loved by the congregation, for a period of convalescence in Bournemouth. Yesterday, Fr Finigan (a.k.a. His Hermeneuticalness), a great devotee of Our Lady, wrote this post for his blog , linked to on our sidebar.

Quite rightly, we usually think of Our Lady as having care for us, rather than us caring for her. The titles of the Litany of Loreto remind us of many different ways in which she acts as our Mother: she is among other things the refuge of sinners, consoler of the afflicted, and health of the sick.

So how can we talk about our care and responsibility for Mary? Let me first explain where this thought came from. The third saying of Jesus from the Cross is related by St John as follows:

“When Jesus therefore had seen his mother and the disciple standing whom he loved, he saith to his mother: Woman, behold thy son. After that, he saith to the disciple: Behold thy mother. And from that hour, the disciple took her to his own.” (Jn 19:26-27)

These verses are part of the gospel for the Mass of Mary the Mother of the Church. St John represents the whole Church, Our Lady is given to him as his mother, and therefore by extension we recognise Our Lady as Mother of the Church. Pope Paul VI proclaimed this title in 1964, at the end of the third session of the second Vatican Council. (He was opposed by many, and criticised for proclaiming the title on his own initiative.)

Now that all concerns the first part of the saying of Jesus, but He also said to St John “Behold thy mother” and we are told that the disciple took Our Lady “to his own” or into his keeping, to his own house and care.

I think that it is reasonable to extend this part of Our Lord’s saying also and to draw from it an understanding of the duty of care towards Our Lady that we all have, as members of the Church, represented by St John.

We cannot, of course, give anything of advantage to Our Lady in heaven. She enjoys the beatific vision and is the Queen of all the angels and saints for ever in perfect happiness. There is nothing we can add to that. Here on earth, however, Our Lady is blasphemed, misunderstood, mocked, and ignored. Only recently, there have been sad photographs from churches in France where the statue of Our Lady has been knocked down and smashed. We can care for Our Lady in the sense of showing our devotion to her in reparation for these outrages as well as trying to introduce others to her, so that she can continue to help more and more people to “do whatever He tells you.”

What I am suggesting is nothing new – it is essentially what Our Lady herself asked for at Fatima, that we should offer up our prayers and sacrifices in reparation to her Immaculate Heart. In our own time, we might just emphasise another aspect of this reparation which may not be so obvious. In addition to the offering of penance and prayer, we can also offer the charitable work of helping others to understand the truth about Our Lady and know accurately what our Catholic doctrine is. When we do so, we also help them to know Jesus Christ better, and understand better His true divinity and perfect humanity.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Our Care and Responsibility for Mary

  1. johnhenrycn says:

    I seem to recall that Fr Tim was threatened with legal action over a negative article he wrote some years back (maybe 6?) after which he withdrew from Blogshire (h/t BB). I don’t have him on my “Favourites” bar any longer because I thought he no longer had a blog. Fr Z has never let me comment on his blog. Don’t know why. I’m thinner than he is, but that hardly seems a good reason.


  2. kathleen says:

    I don’t remember that “negative article” of Fr Tim’s you mention, JH, nor the threatened “legal action”. He once had an enormous flourishing parish full of traditional Catholics at Blackfen, not far from London – in fact he was making quite a name for himself and for his parish in that part of England – which didn’t go down well with the ‘magic circle’ of liberal priests and bishops! He was packed off to far off coastal Margate, which can only be seen as a punishment for being a good orthodox priest. But in typical Fr Tim’s way, he then made a great success of that parish too!

    You might remember the terrible replacement priest who was subsequently sent to Blackfen, a very liberal self-confessed ‘gay’ who flaunted his homosexuality on Facebook; it made headline news! We were obliged to remove our post reporting on the subject – a post that had received thousands of cyber ‘hits’ and that included many erudite, informative comments – fearing legal action ourselves.
    (Come to think about it, perhaps that is what you were referring to.)

    What I do remember is that soon after Pope Francis’ shocking statements and actions became more widespread, provoking a barrage of outrage on the blogosphere, Fr Tim Finigan began to withdraw from blogging. You will be able to guess his reasons for this… He then started to have health issues, probably as a consequence of so much upset and stress.

    We must keep this good priest in our prayers, as Father Z asks. Good, holy priests are worth more than all the gold in the world.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s