I wish more Catholics in Scotland loved Mass more than they fear (a tiny risk of) death

[CP&S comment – How far many of our priests have fallen from the heroic priests of the British Isles during Penal Times! At a very real risk of capture, torture and death they put the importance of bringing Our Lord to their flock above anything else. They knew the value of the Sacrifice of the Mass, seemingly unlike today’s shepherds of souls.]

by Dorothy Cummings Mc Lean

EDINBURGH, Scotland, January 7, 2021 —  I think I broke a law yesterday.

There are Catholic Scots who are so frightened of the virus that they would rather nobody at all went to Mass, even though there is no evidence that anyone in Scotland has been infected at public Masses since they resumed in mid-July.

I’m not sure. Maybe I just violated a rule. Or failed to follow government advice. At any rate, I went to Epiphany Day Mass, thinking it would be my last opportunity to attend Mass in person for weeks. I had no idea that public worship had been suspended from 12:01 AM that morning, and I don’t think the priest did either. 

Earlier this week, the First Minister announced that public worship in Scotland would not be permitted until February 2. I duly reported this, and when I saw news that the ban did not come into effect until Friday, January 8, I sent a correction to an editor. 

By then an English Conservative MP, Sir Edward Leigh, had written a letter to the First Minister pointing out that banning religious worship without evidence it was a threat to public health is a violation of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Scottish Catholic bishops added their mild protest, worth quoting at length:

… [W]e are also perplexed by the decision, given that the stringent measures taken since last March to ensure public safety in our churches have been effective. No evidence has been forthcoming to justify the inclusion of places of worship as sources of infection. Without such scientific evidence these restrictions will appear to Catholics to be arbitrary and unfair. Moreover, significant number of other sectors similarly restricted last March alongside public worship – such as construction, manufacturing and elite sports – have now been left free to continue in operation.

We also note that, in England, the essential contribution of public worship to the spiritual welfare of all citizens during this crisis has now been endorsed by the decision not to close places of worship while the Scottish Government has apparently retreated from this view, causing dismay and confusion.

We are very aware of the disappointment these closures will cause not only to our own Catholic community, but to many of our fellow-Christians and those of other faiths in Scotland. We wish to emphasise again the spiritual, social and psychological benefits provided by continuing public worship, and we ask for these to be taken into full account in future decisions. Public worship is a human right and is a duty humanity owes to God. More concretely, Catholics need the Eucharist and the Sacramental encounter with the LORD as necessary to their spiritual wellbeing and their ultimate salvation.

While we unequivocally share the common goal of protecting public health, we urge the Scottish Government, when the present measures are reviewed later in January, to reconsider these restrictions in the light of the above concerns.

But instead of reconsidering, late on Tuesday night the Scottish Government moved up the ban on public worship to Wednesday, thus leaving Catholics at risk of a £60 fine for attending Epiphany Mass. I wonder if the Scottish government had only just learned that there was an Epiphany Mass, and that January 6 is usually a Holy Day of Obligation in Scotland, or that religious folk don’t restrict their public religious observances to the weekend. Naturally, I also wonder if this was their way of showing the Auld Kirk who is boss.

I must say, learning about the late-night date-switch made me very cross, and I hadn’t enjoyed a lengthy period of good mood to begin with. Sir Edward Leigh’s fraternal intervention—he is the President of the Catholic Union of Great Britain—was taken with ill grace by those Catholic Scots whose hatred for English “Tories” far outweighs their love for the Holy Sacrifice of the Altar. I had been reading their thoughts, and the thoughts of other Catholic Scots who believe more in the efficacy of the lockdowns than in the unique virtues of public worship, with deep shame.

It’s all so cowardly. There are Catholic Scots who are so frightened of the virus that they would rather nobody at all went to Mass, even though there is no evidence that anyone in Scotland has been infected at public Masses since they resumed in mid-July. It would surely be strange if there was: for five months most church-going Catholics in Scotland assembled in well-ventilated churches built for 200 or more in groups of 40, masked, hands sanitized at the door, praying at least six feet apart from each household group, entering through one door, leaving through another. Some parishes even suffered from over-enthusiastic lay volunteers who hissed at suspected infractions, alienating Catholics who dislike being nannied at Mass. My community was more fortunate: we had just one mild-mannered (if large) young man to tick off names on the reservation list, give instructions, and watch the spy. 

Oh yes, there was a spy. This unpleasant—or perhaps just disturbed—woman would come into the church to count our numbers and report to goodness knows whom. I am ashamed to say that she, too, is a Catholic, and her behavior was not something I expected in a country where Catholicism was brutally oppressed for 233 years and then marginalized for 200 more.

As of December 26, Scottish churchgoers were forced to halve our numbers to 20, and one priest I know coped with that by saying two short Masses in the same time it usually takes him to say one. He had already added a 5pm Mass. On that first Sunday Mass of 20, I kept looking over my shoulder to see if the spy had sneaked in to count. 

It would be untrue to say that I never expected anything like this to happen in my lifetime. I received the sacrament of Confirmation before the sudden fall of the Berlin Wall, and while pondering what my new responsibilities might entail, I decided they included running the risk of being martyred by Communist invaders. Despite my ordinary 1980s Catholic education, I had read a lot about the martyrs, and I believed a martyr’s crown was worth any unpleasantness Mr Chernenko could devise. So, yes, it has occurred to me that a civil power might one day criminalize public worship. 

What did not occur to me was that this could happen in a Western democracy, especially one that should be chastened by its long history of oppressing and marginalizing religious minorities. But an even worse surprise is that there are Catholics so frightened of dying in a few months of a respiratory illness (instead of in a few more years of cancer, heart failure, dementia or pneumonia) that they are firmly opposed to re-opening their churches to anyone, even when there is no evidence that public worship, carried out in the above-mentioned circumstances, spreads the disease. This terror seems strange in people who purport to believe in an eternity of bliss after death. 

“Any risk, no matter how small, must be avoided” typed one of my fellow Catholics, apparently without shame. Had she forgotten all the Middle Eastern Christians who have regularly risked (and often lost) their lives to attend public worship during her lifetime? Had she forgotten what the martyrs of Soviet Communism were willing to risk for Christ? Does she think the underground Church in China is, in fact, just asking for it? And is she completely insensitive to the pain of fellow Scots in great distress because regular reception of the Eucharist is the only thing standing between them and mental collapse?   

From 1613 until his arrest in 1614, St. John Ogilvie, a Jesuit priest, celebrated underground Masses for courageous Scottish Catholics. His flock were willing to risk prison, heavy fines, and the rack for the sake of attending Mass. The Catholic Relief Act came into effect in Scotland in 1793, sparing us from such punishments, although anti-Catholic prejudice carried on into the 20thcentury. What has happened since then to turn so many of us into cowards? And when will the bishops apply to the European Court of Human Rights? 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to I wish more Catholics in Scotland loved Mass more than they fear (a tiny risk of) death

  1. Mary Salmond says:

    And the leaders and media who buy into the virus are in grave sin to what they are doing to their people.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Brother Burrito says:

    Since lockdown began in March last year, I have “attended” Mass via Zoom. On Christmas day, my son and I went to church, in the flesh. The aseptic precautions were more stringent than those at the hospital where I work! Holy Communion was under the form of bread alone, which should be the norm forever more, in my opinion.

    COVID is very real, and kills mainly the elderly and unfit, though some young and healthy types succumb too. Once you have a serious dose of it, there seems to be little that even the most intensive medical care can do for you. I know this because I work in intensive care medicine!

    I got my vaccination the other day. My arm was a bit sore for a few days. If it is good enough for our two Popes, then it is good enough for all of us! Distant cooperation with the evil of foetal cell harvesting is not a mortal sin.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. mmvc says:

    BB, did you watch the interview with Dr Pamela Acker? I’d be genuinely interested in your thoughts on what she has to say.


  4. johnhenrycn says:

    BB says: “If it is good enough for our two popes…”

    One pope and another half-pope perhaps, I’m not sure. As an anaesthesiologist working in ICU – one I’d entrust with my life unless euthanasia were being considered – where were you taught the dogma that “[d]istant cooperation with the evil of foetal cell harvesting is not a mortal sin” ?

    Just the other day I was reading a LifeSite report by John-Henry Westen concerning a recent interview he’d had with biologist Pamela Acker:
    “Acker dispels the myth that these cell lines are created using spontaneous abortions…these cells have to be gathered within minutes of the abortion. A miscarriage would simply not provide cells that were alive enough for researchers to be able to use the cells. This is where things get very disturbing, because in most cases it’s not a *simple abortion*…Acker says:

    “They will actually deliver these babies via cesarean section. The babies are still alive when the researchers start extracting the tissue; to the point where their heart is still beating, and they’re generally not given any anesthetic, because that would disrupt the cells that the researchers are trying to extract. So, they’re removing this tissue, all the while the baby is alive…”

    Is that not true, BB? Pretty gruesome if it is. Or is it because harvesting of the HEK-293 fetal cells and other baby liver cell lines took place as long ago as 1972 when you were still in short pants that you consider it “distant” enough to qualify as merely venial sin, or not a sin at all?

    Unlike you, Daddy was not an anaesthesiologist. He was a less qualified GP anaesthetist, and an agnostic to boot. Not sure whether anaesthetists still exist. He also served time on our local hospital abortion committee. I’m told he never voted to approve any abortions. Have I recounted that family memory before?
    Returning to your point, even if COVID vaccinations are not mortal sins, I find it amazing they have been invented so quickly – in a matter of weeks, according to their inventors at Pfizer Labs. All other vaccines have taken many years of research and development before becoming available. And where is the vaccine for the Norwalk virus, for SARS, for MERS? Where is the vaccine for HIV?

    A miraculous overnight creation is what the COVID vaccines seem to be.
    Qui bono ?

    Does this not raise a concern whether the COVID vaccine(s) have been rushed into production without proper medical oversight? There used to be a judge, now retired, at our courthouse who was a Thalidomide baby. I must ask whether they’ll be getting the COVID cure in their flipper arm.

    Anyway, before getting this vaccine (have never had a flu vaccine) I will want to at least study the statistical reports concerning how many people, having had the vaccine, nevertheless die from COVID or suffer allergic reactions to it, and the severity of same. This data will not be available in a meaningful non-anecdotal way for quite some time, even assuming WHO and our national health bureaucracies report the data honestly. Is that something we can assume, doctor?

    Liked by 2 people

  5. johnhenrycn says:

    🙂 I was hoping you would correct my formatting, K.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Brother Burrito says:

    This article explains it all far better than I ever could:


    Liked by 1 person

  7. mmvc says:

    Once you’ve heard what Dr Acker has to say, you will realise that there is much more to the moral/ethical aspect of this than ‘mere’(!) foetal cell lines from decades ago.
    No amount of mental gymnastics can excuse the horrific evil that is behind the manufacture of all too many vaccines.

    There’s a world of difference between ignorance and wilful ignorance.

    Do please watch the video.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s