Take a look at this and see what you think, but please don’t be alarmed. Church history is filled with challenging periods when corrupt popes ruled and anti-popes added to the confusion. “Let not your hearts be troubled.” Trust in God and pray. I don’t know if we are living in the time prophesied by St. Francis or not. I do know that our response in all circumstances is to commit to the duties of our state in life and to work out our salvation in fear and trembling committing ourselves to the will of God. Mary Ann
Guest post by David Martin:
The Prophecy of St. Francis about a Future Pope
Shortly before his death, St. Francis of Assisi called together the friars of his Order and detailed a prophecy of what was to come upon the Church in the latter days. That this prophecy references the last times is evident by the prediction of events that would not be fulfilled until after Vatican II, and by its placing these events in the time frame of the Gospel prophecy concerning the great tribulations just before Christ’s Second Coming. (Matthew 24) St. Francis relates the following concerning the future Church under siege.
“The time is fast approaching in which there will be great trials and afflictions; perplexities and dissensions, both spiritual and temporal, will abound; the charity of many will grow cold, and the malice of the wicked will increase.
“The devils will have unusual power, the immaculate purity of our Order, and of others, will be so much obscured that there will be very few Christians who will obey the true Sovereign Pontiff [cf, Benedict XVI] and the Roman Church with loyal hearts and perfect charity. At the time of this tribulation a man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, who, by his cunning, will endeavor to draw many into error and death.
“Then scandals will be multiplied, our Order will be divided, and many others will be entirely destroyed, because they will consent to error instead of opposing it.
“There will be such diversity of opinions and schisms among the people, the religious and the clergy, that, except those days were shortened, according to the words of the Gospel, even the elect would be led into error, were they not specially guided, amid such great confusion, by the immense mercy of God.
“Then our Rule and manner of life will be violently opposed by some, and terrible trials will come upon us. [cf, Franciscans of the Immaculate] Those who are found faithful will receive the crown of life; but woe to those who, trusting solely in their Order, shall fall into tepidity, for they will not be able to support the temptations permitted for the proving of the elect.
“Those who persevere in their fervor and adhere to virtue with love and zeal for the truth, will suffer injuries and persecutions as rebels and schismatics; for their persecutors, urged on by the evil spirits, will say they are rendering a great service to God by destroying such ‘pestilent men’ from the face of the earth. But the Lord will be the refuge of the afflicted, and will save all who trust in Him. And in order to be like their Head [Christ], these, the elect, will act with confidence, and by their death will purchase for themselves eternal life; choosing to obey God rather than man, they will fear nothing, and they will prefer to perish rather than consent to falsehood and perfidy.
“Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it under foot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Jesus Christ will send them not a true pastor, but a destroyer.”
In this prophecy, St. Francis relates how very few Christians “will obey the true sovereign pontiff” [presumably Benedict XVI] and how many would be misled by “a man, not canonically elected” who “will be raised to the Pontificate.” The mention of a “true” sovereign pontiff implies that the opposite would coexist with him. To infer that this refers to Pope Francis is in no way unreasonable, when we consider his ongoing contempt for rules, discipline, and tradition, and the fact that he has praised enemies like abortionist Emma Bonino and heretic Martin Luther, while persecuting holy men like Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Sarah, and the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate in Rome (FFI).
St. Francis no doubt was referring to the FFI, when he said, “our Rule and manner of life will be violently opposed by some, and terrible trials will come upon us.” We all know of the cruel punishment that came upon the Franciscan Friars in 2013, whose founder Fr. Stefano Manelli was dismissed and whose members were forbidden from saying the Latin Mass and forced into saying the modern Mass against their conscience and against the rules of the order.
In speaking of the Church, St. Francis said, “scandals will be multiplied,” which have certainly come to pass. What else could describe a pope dubbing Catholic procreation as “rabbit breeding” while warmly inviting transgenders to the Vatican to meet with him and receive his blessing? And of course there is the hot-button issue of allowing divorced and civilly remarried adulterers to receive Communion, as sanctioned in Amoris Laetita. Jesus spoke of this very thing, saying, “Woe to the world because of scandals.” (Matthew 18:7)
From the onset we have seen something very “contrary” with Francis. While scolding any attempts to convert outsiders to the Catholic Faith, he blesses apostates and permits them to poison his flock with their rebellious thinking. While dubbing “idolaters” those Christians who hold tenaciously to Catholic tradition, he blesses the lost and misled who bow to the planetary idol of “Mother Earth.”
Worse yet is his formal denial of the Church’s dogmatic teaching on eternal hell, as inscribed in Article 297 of Amoris Laetita. “No one can be condemned forever, because that is not the logic of the Gospel! Here I am not speaking only of the divorced and remarried, but of everyone, in whatever situation they find themselves.” Formal heresy anyone?
However, the real crime of his pontificate was nailed by St. Francis, when he said, “Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it.” Francis, who has often fashioned nice words of praise for the pro-life movement, recently dismissed all the members of the Pontifical Academy for Life and has rewritten its statutes in such a way that, beginning January 1, 2017, the new members will not be required to hold to the oath to defend the dignity of a person “from conception until (natural) death.” (Source)
And now Pope Francis has praised the 1960s German moral theologian Bernard Häring, one of the most prominent dissenters from Pope Paul VI’s 1968 encyclical Humanae Vitae, for his new morality which the pope said helped “moral theology to flourish.” “I think Bernard Häring was the first to start looking for a new way to help moral theology to flourish again,” he said in comments, published Sunday by La Civiltà Cattolica, that were given during a dialogue with the Jesuit order which was gathered for its 36th general Congregation on October 24, 2016, in Rome. (Source)
Apparently Francis thinks that Humanae Vitae was serving to drive morality back to the jungle. Humanae Vitae, as we know, is Pope Paul’s crowning masterpiece on the sanctity of human life which absolutely forbids abortion or any type of artificial birth control. The entire Church is bound by it.
Even so, Francis is complicit with United Nations anti-life agenda. We recount the infamous event of April 28, 2015, when the Vatican hosted a Soros-backed climate change conference in which several key pro-abortion advocates from the U.N., including U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and Jeffrey Sachs, proposed that the Church adopt their Sustainable Development Goals of making the planet a safer place through worldwide depopulation. (abortion) The proposals of April 28 were fully endorsed by the Vatican the very next day.
On September 25, 2015, Pope Francis addressed the United Nations General Assembly, urging the approval of the Sustainable Development Goals, which passed that day in the U.N. His encyclical on climate change would serve to get the fire going on this, and he himself had expressed hope that his environmental encyclical, Laudato Si, would be used to promote the passage of the UN Sustainable Development Goals in September 2015.
The foregoing warrants still a closer look at the prophecy about an uncanonically elected pope. St. Francis said, “a man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate,” indicating that his ascent to the papacy will be done before the entire Church, but somehow his election will not be canonical. It suggests that a private interest group will place this man into power under the guise of an election, so that he could advance their agenda.
Credible reports from 2015 indicate that Benedict XVI was coerced into resigning, which was providentially foreshadowed in Pope Benedict’s inaugural speech of April 24, 2005, when he said: “Pray for me, that I may not flee for fear of the wolves.” We know from Cardinal Danneels of Brussels that he was part of a radical “mafia” reformist group opposed to Benedict XVI. Danneels, known for his support of abortion, LGBT rights, gay-marriage, and pornography said in a taped interview in September 2015 that he and several cardinals were part of this “mafia” club which bore the name of St. Gallen. He said the group was calling for drastic changes in the Church, to make it “much more modern,” and that the plan all along was to have Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio [Francis] head it. (Source)
This infamous clique which is documented in Austen Ivereigh’s biography of Pope Francis, The Great Reformer, comprised the key members of the Vatican “gay-lobby” which held the reigns and created much chaos at the October 2014-2015 Synods on the Family. According to some reports, lobby members threatened Pope Benedict with extortion prior to his resignation.
This is credible when we consider that on February 11, 2012, one year before Pope Benedict announced his resignation, it was reported that Benedict XVI was given only one year to live if he didn’t resign. Cardinal Paolo Romeo, Archbishop of Palermo, reportedly said these things to a group of people in Beijing toward the end of 2011. According to the report, Cardinal Romeo “harshly criticized Pope Benedict XVI,” and “with self-assurance, as if he knew with precision, Cardinal Romeo announced that the Holy Father would have only twelve months to live. During his conversations in China he prophesied the death of Pope Benedict XVI within the next 12 months.” (Source)
Still another point that lends credence to the idea of an “uncanonically elected pope” is the testimony of Pope Benedict himself, who stated that he never renounced his Petrine Office. On the eve of his resignation, he said: “Here, allow me to go back once again to 19 April 2005. The real gravity of the decision was also due to the fact that from that moment on I was engaged always and forever by the Lord. Always – anyone who accepts the Petrine ministry no longer has any privacy. He belongs always and completely to everyone, to the whole Church. In a manner of speaking, the private dimension of his life is completely eliminated.” … “The ‘always’ is also a “forever” – there can no longer be a return to the private sphere. My decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this.” (Pope Benedict XVI at the General Audience of February 27, 2013)
Hence Benedict XVI is still pope, wholly and entirely, so that nothing of his Petrine character has been diminished. Yet, there can only be one pope, not two, so what does that make Francis? If Francis is a true, canonically elected pope, then Benedict XVI can no longer be pope, since the Grace of State of his Office no longer rests with him, but has been given to Pope Francis. Yet Benedict insists he is pope “forever” and that his “decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this.”
If Benedict XVI had renounced the entirety of the Petrine Office, i.e. the contemplative and active ministry together, it could perhaps be argued that he is merely Pope Emeritus and is no longer a valid pope, but he argues emphatically against this, stating that he is pope “forever” and that he has resigned only the active ministry thereof. Yet there cannot exist two popes simultaneously. The idea of a “two-headed” pope or a “communal papacy” is heretical and foreign to anything Christ taught. It’s either Francis or Benedict XVI. Which is it?
Either one of them (Benedict or Francis) is Pope, or neither of them is Pope. Since you seem to be making the point that Francis is a formal heretic ,only lacking in having been declared so by competent authority, then that would leave him out, since an obstinate heretic cannot remain Pope.
Then we are back to the questions you pose and evidence you maintain to support that Benedict probably did not resign, and even if he did, that the election of Francis was not canonical to begin with due to the actions of the St. Gallen group.
So following your assertions, we are left with either Benedict as pope, or no-one as pope depending on whether or not Benedict acted without force or undue pressure with the intention of fully renouncing the Petrine Office. Surely, competent authorities must be asking themselves the same questions. None of what you are saying is new, and has in fact existed since shortly after the conclave, but there has been a growing concern among the clergy and the faithful, fueled by the written and spoken words of Francis, as well as his authoritative actions in governing the Church.
The proper interpretation of prophecies and warnings and other personal revelations is, as always, fraught with peril, but even so this one is far more likely to refer to the massive schism of the 14th Century and all those anti-popes, or even to the horrors of the Protestant rebellion, than to the fact that some people today are unhappy with Amoris Laetitia or to the disciplining of a disobedient and rebellious faction within the FFI.
“The time is fast approaching in which there will be great trials and afflictions; perplexities and dissensions, both spiritual and temporal, will abound; “
That depends on whether or nor you consider events 700 years in the future to be, “fast approaching,” or not.
I do not, myself.
“Church history is filled with challenging periods when corrupt popes ruled and anti-popes added to the confusion…”
Quite. Why should now be any different? How do we “know” this applies to today’s situation?
.”..but somehow his election will not be canonical. “
“Somehow?” How how?
Benedict was nor expelled, or forced out. He quit, voluntarily. His decision.
Bur that doesn’t fit, does it? So, let’s ignore it.
All paranoid folly, I fear.
That’s quite insightful (Mrs Avila).
St Francis may have experienced the visions attributed to him; but the Works of the Seraphic Father St Francis of Assisi seems to be a translation of a translation of a verbal address given by him to his friars centuries before the 1882 R. Washbourne edition was published; so I would agree (!) with the statement made by my friend that the interpretation of prophesies is “fraught with peril”. Nevertheless, I’m able to envisage the Age of PF as a sinister epoch, almost a doom-laden one, even without the benefit of prophesy. Time will tell.
Both Archbishop Gänswein and Cardinal Müller recently said something enigmatic about both popes exercising a “papal office”:
Re the FFI, I believe that the prophesy of ‘opposition’ and ‘terrible trials’ within the Franciscan order was at least in part a reference to the destruction of the FFI. Thankfully its founder, Father Stefano Manelli, has now been completely exonerated of the vile accusations levelled against him. With two of the initial protesters gone, may this previously flourishing and exemplary order, by the grace of God, rise from the rubble the destructive ‘investigators’ and ‘commissioners’ have left behind!
“Thankfully its founder, Father Stefano Manelli, has now been completely exonerated of the vile accusations levelled against him.”
MMVC, could you please send a postcard to my friend reminding him of that? He still thinks of Menelli and his loyalists as a “disobedient and rebellious faction within the FFI”.
Whilst I also agree that the interpretation of prophesies is “fraught with peril”, a risky business, and often only understood to have been fulfilled years later, and in hindsight, there are all the same many wise and pragmatic voices in the Church currently advising us of the dangers of our times. The confusion surrounding Amoris Laetitia (and the Pope’s stubborn refusal to reaffirm the Church’s doctrinal teaching in replying to the Cardinals’ dubia), is just one more troubling chapter in a very troubling Papacy, albeit an important one.
Archbishop Schneider announced in 2014 that we truly are in the fourth great crisis in the Church today.
“Liberals, collaborating with the “new paganism”, are driving the Catholic Church towards a split, according to Bishop Athanasius Schneider, the liturgical specialist who is carrying on a rearguard fight against “abuses” in the Church.
So serious are the problems, Bishop Schneider said in an interview last week, that this is the fourth great crisis in the history of the Church, comparable to the fourth-century Arian heresy in which a large part of the Church hierarchy was implicated.“
He still thinks of Menelli and his loyalists as a “disobedient and rebellious faction within the FFI”
No I don’t, and please desist from putting words in my mouth.
So sorry, Jab-A-Lot – who exactly did you mean when you called them a “disobedient and rebellious faction within the FFI”? Chapter and verse shouldn’t be too much bother for you.
Kathleen (21:07) applauds Athanasius Schneider, O.R.C., auxiliary bishop in semi-Godforsaken Khazakstan (where my old friend Colin was a Christian Brethren missionary before he died) but we all know his chances for preferment under the present regime are almost zero. But God bless the co-Pope. Holy Father Knows Best.
It’s a funny world. The actress, Jane Wyatt (Father Knows Best) who lived to 96, was the child of two Roman Catholic converts, Christopher Billopp Wyatt, Jr and Euphemia Van Rensselaer Waddington. Two very traditional Catholic names, if I’m not mistaken.
Who, exactly, is “them” ?
“Who,exactly, is ‘them’?”
Huh? How should I know who you meant at 06:33 when you spoke of “…a disobedient and rebellious faction within the FFI…”, which is why I asked you at 21:58 to identify them. M’kay?
Prophecy Attributed to Saint Francis Concocted by Excommunicated 13th Century Franciscan Sect, the Fraticelli
by Raymond A. Antonini
There is a prophecy attributed to Saint Francis of Assisi that has circulated in traditional Catholic circles in recent years that follows as below. The significance of the highlighted passages will be shown.
“Act bravely, my brethren; take courage and trust in the Lord. The time is fast approaching in which there will be great trials and afflictions; perplexities and dissensions, both spiritual and temporal, will abound; the charity of many will grow cold, and the malice of the wicked will increase. The devils will have unusual power, the immaculate purity of our Order, and of others, will be so much obscured that there will be very few Christians who will obey the true Sovereign Pontiff and the Roman Church with loyal hearts and perfect charity. At the time of this tribulation a man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, who, by his cunning, will endeavour to draw many into error and death. Then scandals will be multiplied, our Order will be divided, and many others will be entirely destroyed, because they will consent to error instead of opposing it. There will be such diversity of opinions and schisms among the people, the religious and the clergy, that, except those days were shortened, according to the words of the Gospel, even the elect would be led into error, were they not specially guided, amid such great confusion, by the immense mercy of God. Then our Rule and manner of life will be violently opposed by some, and terrible trials will come upon us. Those who are found faithful will receive the crown of life; but woe to those who, trusting solely in their Order, shall fall into tepidity, for they will not be able to support the temptations permitted for the proving of the elect. Those who preserve their fervour and adhere to virtue with love and zeal for the truth, will suffer injuries and, persecutions as rebels and schismatics; for their persecutors, urged on by the evil spirits, will say they are rendering a great service to God by destroying such pestilent men from the face of the earth. but the Lord will be the refuge of the afflicted, and will save all who trust in Him. And in order to be like their Head, these, the elect, will act with confidence, and by their death will purchase for themselves eternal life; choosing to obey God rather than man, they will fear nothing, and they will prefer to perish rather than consent to falsehood and perfidy. Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it under foot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor, but a destroyer.”
The source for this prophecy in the recent era has been the Works of the Seraphic Father St. Francis Of Assisi, R. Washbourne, London, 1882, C.. XIII, pp. 248-250. which is a translation of the following French edition: Sancti Francisci Assisiatis seraphici minorum patriarcæ opera omnia, col. 429- 430, éd. Imprimerie de la bibliothèque ecclésiastique, Paris, 1880.
This alleged prophecy of St. Francis has been used by some, since the rampant heresy of the recent age, to bolster the theological teaching of the Church that the Holy See remains or becomes vacant due to the pre-existing or post-election formal heresy, schism or apostasy of the elected supreme pontiff. The Church’s teaching itself, derived from Divine Law and decreed and promoted by Pope Innocent III, Pope Paul IV, the Doctors of the Church Sts. Robert Bellarmine, Alphonsus de Liguori, Francis de Sales, as well as by St. Antoninus and numerous saints and theologians does not need the support, however, of this dubious prophecy.
This prediction has also been used by those who either hold that a rival claimant to the papal throne is being obscured by a falsely elected one, as do those who assert the spurious 1958 papal election of Cardinal Siri of Genoa, as well as by those who mistakenly hold that the five ‘Vatican II era popes’ are valid Supreme Pontiffs, just “bad”, misguided or only materially in error.
The footnote for the prophecy in the Washbourne edition, itself, references the most likely subject for the prophecy to have been the election of Pope Urban VI in 1378 which commenced the Great Western Schism.
In reality the prophecy was concocted by the Fraticelli, also known as Spirituali, dissident members of the Franciscan order, and applied by them in general to the genuine popes who suppressed their order in the 13th and 14th centuries, but specifically first to the election of Pope Boniface VIII after the abdication of Pope St. Celestine V in 1294, and later as well to the election of Pope John XXII, against whom they would lay the charge of heresy.
Saint Francis died in 1226, and due to the stringency of his rule concerning holy poverty, the Order of Friars Minor then broke into two competing groups, the Zelanti, or Spirituals, and the Relaxati, known later as the Conventuals. Popes Gregory IX, Innocent IV and Nicholas III in their Bulls attempted to restore order between the two competing groups but without permanent success.
Many of the Spirituali went beyond the bounds of orthodoxy and fell into both heresy and schism – the exact same charges they would subsequently lay against those who suppressed their Rule and their branch of the Order. From the the ideal of St. Francis, that his disciples by evangelical poverty, complete self-denial, and humility, should lead the world back to Christ, a few of the Spirituali actually advocated that all property of both clergy and laity alike must be held in common and some even advocated the violent overthrow of society to achieve that means. Not all, however, went to that extreme.
There were, however, many separate dissident groups of these Spirituali, referred to as Fraticelli from Friars Minor. An extremely brief history of the primary core of the main group is as follows.
In 1278, one group of the Spirituali that had been founded by Brother Angelo da Clareno was condemned, and the group imprisoned for life, but later liberated after 1289 by the Superior General of the Franciscan Order, Gaufredi, and sent to Armenia. Subsequently exiled from Armenia in 1293, they returned to Italy in 1294 where Pope St. Celestine V permitted them to live as hermits under the strict observance of the Rule of St. Francis.
After Pope St. Celestine V’s resignation of the Papacy later that year, Pope Boniface VIII revoked all of his predecessor’s concessions to the Spirituali, and they fled to Greece from which location they attacked the legality of the papal action, as well as Boniface’s claim to the papal throne. Hence we find from the ‘prophecy’ the assertion by the Fraticelli that “very few Christians who will obey the true Sovereign Pontiff”, i.e. Celestine V, whom they asserted was still the pope even after his voluntary resignation, and their assertion of the invalidity of the papacy of his successor Pope Boniface VIII, a man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, whom they viewed as illegally forcing Celestine’s resignation:
At this point one must remark on certain similarities to the Siri Thesis.
In 1317 John XXII, pursuant to a decree of Boniface VIII, declared Angelo excommunicated and placed him in custody. Hence the real reason for the Fraticelli asserting that John XXII was an antipope, and labeling him with the libelous charge of formal heresy over the yet to be officially defined doctrine of the location of the soul after death.
From the prophecy above we see the clear reference of “our Order will be divided,” to the split after Saint Francis’ death between the Spirituals and the Conventuals, the suppression of the strict observance of their rule by various popes of the 13th, 14th and 15th centuries from the following: “then our Rule and manner of life will be violently opposed by some, and terrible trials will come upon us”, their suppression and imprisonment for heresy: “will suffer injuries and, persecutions as rebels and schismatics”, and their pronouncement of ‘antipope’ on any pope who opposed their heresy: “for in those days Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor, but a destroyer.”
Finally, in the 1880 Washbourne edition of the prophecy, the following chapter, XIV, “That Pride and Ostentation are Pernicious to Religious, and that Brother Elias will Die out of the Order.” deals with the Fraticelli’s subsequent dispute with, and character assassination of the 4th Franciscan Superior General, Brother Elias of Cortona. This “prophecy” that they also falsely place in the mouth of Saint Francis is chronologically and causally related to their own ‘prediction’ of Chapter XIII of the antipope: “not a true Pastor, but a destroyer.”
Both are calumnies and the direct result of their obdurate rebellion.
For further information please confer, Don Franceso Ricossa, Sodalitium Periodico – n° 49, Anno XV n. 3 1999, “L’Apocalisse secondo Corsini “, pp. 52-67, specifically pp. 65-67, also Frère Jean O.F.M. Cap., Sul Medesimo Soggetto. n. 28, primavera 1999, “A pro-pos d’une ‘prédiction de saint François d’As-sise’,” pp. 178-184 as well as Michael Bihl, “Fraticelli”, The Catholic Encyclopedia, R. Appleton Co., 1909.
Silvio Mattacchione (21:08) – I had no idea. I still don’t. Would it not have been best to start by telling people what your position is, and then lead us gently by the hand through your argument?
Please pray for the conversion of Eric McDonald-
St Michael, Pray for us…
Dear St Michael, help us.Please St Michael, help my friend Eric McDonald.I pray for Eric’s conversion to true faith in Jesus Christ.Please help Eric to turn to Jesus and to trust in Jesus.Eric needs the love that flows from The Sacred Heart of Jesus and The Motherly Love of Mary, Most Holy.
St Michael, pray that Our Heavenly Father, will have mercy upon Eric’s soul. St Michael, I miss my friend-Please watch over him and protect him.Please help us to find each other again.
Str Michael, I ask your help in the name of Jesus Christ…Amen
Jesus, Mary I love You. Save Souls !!!!!!!
Benedict is the true Pope. Francis is the destroyer .Francis was sent by Jesus for the end time. Just as somebody had to be Judas; so,now we have Francis ( someone has to be the last Bishop of Rome. , ie. PETRAS ROMANO) Pray, hope,and don’t worry.St.Padte Pio said that and we should all “Trust in Jesus” St.Faustina of the Divine Mercy told us that Jesus is coming soon.Be ready Pray for Benedict & pray for Francis.Jesus said “pray for your enemies”.
Pingback: The Two Popes & Pietro, The Roman Curia Boss | Discerning the Times
Pingback: Do the Prophecies of Saint Francis Explain It All? – RemnantDisciplesJtM
Thank you for this very timely and comprehensive article which explains very well what we are facing in this most unprecedented time.
I also find all of the commentary rich with faith and much truth which we all need so much more of in this world heading to hell in a hand basket presently. Lies and propaganda are flourishing throughout due to the crooked ways of the world and the infiltration of the Church and society with all manner of evil corruptions.
I just wrote to a friend fellow blogger and wanted to share the thoughts there with everyone here. Additionally here I want to leave a few links to articles I wrote recently to add hopefully as much dimension to these discussions for we faithful in order to maintain but also clarity our faith and belief in all facets of our daily trials and tribulations in this rather chaotic twisted life these days. Perhaps, I hope and pray in all of these conversations a bit more truth is presented and even the eyes of unbelievers or a doubting Thomas will be opened and more souls will be living in accordance with Almighty God through a living faith in Jesus Christ our Lord Savior and Redeemer. Amen.
I think there is quite a lot of confusion in all schools of thought as to exactly what is going on within the scope of Latter Days. Children of the Light of the Church are not the only ones needing enlightenment but the lost lambs or all sinners and even unbelievers is more precisely what Archbishop Vigano may be intending to emphasis with Trump. Could that have been specified or said more clearly of course because we all find after the fact we could have done better! We all fall short of the glory of God, and right now we are all in a cauldron of deceptions, hate, evil and madness like never before! Deceptions have been going on since right after Jesus died and was risen. Nothing is 100% spot on but the Archbishop is right to reach out to the President and the gesture is appreciated by many especially in light of the fact that a Heretic Pope occupies the Pontificate of the Roman Catholic church, and many are not speaking out about it just like in our nation nobody was really speaking out about all of the lies and corruption or more importantly doing anything about it while that traitor Obama and his backer Biden were running the Nation off the rails into socialism and destruction which we are all suffering for now! Taking a stand is critical also not just saying we will be good and read our scriptures which is of course imperative for all Christians regardless of what denomination they hail from, but just like in WWII it took politics on the righteous side and blood and guts to make things happen because God doesn’t just wave the wand and fix all the crap we bring on ourselves! End Time I’m thinking is a relative term that can be not so clearly defined as to a fairly close approximation of it happening in our lifetimes of many more down the road, because as Holy Scripture states no one will know the appointed time and Jesus will come like a thief in the night! What we can be certain of so far is the time is growing near like never before because of all the right factors being in place for the appearance of the antichrist which before this modern time were not available. Perhaps if many others like the Archbishop would get busy and resist and speak up or do more to help alter the direction things have been going since the Obama years and had sooner much of this would not be as bad as it is, but this is the time to act and do it boldly in my humble opinion. We need many authoritative figures like the Archbishop and our President Trump taking a final stand because it’s do or die to avoid the bigger calamities that are fast approaching with the current trajectory we are all on in this helter-skelter of madness throughout! The big problem as I see it was as the lying politicians were shining us all on playing both ends against the middle the public at large has broken up into too many camps of twisted agendas that all clash with one another and the monsters at the top aided by the crooked MSM are not interested in God, our safety or peace on earth but only more power as they are satanic souls. I give the Archbishop A+ for sticking his neck out when the corruption in the Church and World politics is so snake invested most people are afraid to say anything that points to truth. What good have any of the European nations been in this mess over the last dozen years. Too much more of the same kicking the can down the road and let someone else worry about it mantra it’s not my problem; just so long as I get mine! I hope as we move forward that we as the faithful and determined are able to sift out the TRUTH and stand ready and tall for anything, not worried in the least about even dying for God! I say this because we are in a spiritual warfare now but also a real time physical world war that thus far has been metered out in doses going back to before 911 and since then only escalated on many fronts not just a conventional war battle front. They have happy hour the drag queen reading in elementary schools now for kids to lean what? EVIL! It’s permeated our whole culture and civilization making us barely better than the Mayans that sacrificed babies and others daily!
I say we are headed to hell in a hand basket no two ways about it! I hope more key figures and strong leaders step up and take a stand putting it all on the line! If not; it’s done for! Then it’s every man for himself and no point to doing anything other than sit quietly reading and praying!